Provider-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Evaluation of the Kidneys after Kidney Biopsy

Background: Real-time ultrasonographic guidance is standard practice for performing kidney biopsies and is also used to identify post-biopsy bleeding complications. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of provider-performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in identifying post-biopsy bleeding complications. Methods: Adult patients undergoing outpatient ultrasound (U/S)-guided native kidney biopsy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between August 2022 – June 2023 were included in the study. Immediate post-biopsy and 4-hour post-biopsy U/S imaging were performed by U/S technicians. POCUS assessments by the nephrology provider were conducted upon patient arrival to the recovery bay and 4 hours post-biopsy. The nephrology provider was blinded to the findings of the U/S technician. Presence of hematoma, hematoma size, presence of vascular jet, and presence of intra-renal arteriovenous fistula were documented. The prevalence of each complication and sensitivity and specificity of POCUS were calculated. Results: A total of 82 patients were enrolled. Average age of participants was 55.2 years (SD: 16.5), BMI 28.8 (SD: 6.1), 54.9% were male, 37.8% were Black, and a nephrology attending performed most biopsies (86.6%). Formal radiology U/S detected hematoma and AV fistula in 20.7% (17) and 3.7% (3) immediately post-biopsy and in 40.2 % (33) and 13.4% (11) at 4-hours. By POCUS, hematoma was detected in 19.5% (16) and AV fistula in 2.4% (2) of patients immediately post-biopsy and in 32.9% (27) and 4.9% (4) of patients at 4 hours. When compared with the formal radiology performed U/S, the sensitivity of POCUS for hematoma detection immediately post-biopsy and at 4 hours was 82.4% (95%CI 56.5-96.2) and 75.8% (95%CI 57.7-88.9), respectively. The specificity was 96.2% (95%CI 89.2-99.6) immediately post-biopsy and 95.9% (95%CI 86.0-99.5) at 4 hours. Inter-rater agreement between POCUS and formal radiology U/S for hematoma detection was 93.9 % (κ 0.81) immediately post-biopsy and 87.8 % (κ 0.74) at 4 hours. Conclusion: Provider-performed POCUS was able to detect post-biopsy bleeding complications with high sensitivity and specificity. This valuable, easily accessible tool should be considered for immediate assessment post-biopsy to expedite decision-making at the bedside. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the utility of POCUS to determine appropriateness for discharge after kidney biopsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20247e7sdjhx
Primary Topic
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Provider-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Evaluation of the Kidneys after Kidney Biopsy

C. John Sperati, Steven Menez, Kanza Haq, Nityasree Srialluri
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
article

Provider-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Evaluation of the Kidneys after Kidney Biopsy

C. John Sperati, Steven Menez, Kanza Haq, Nityasree Srialluri
article en

Abstract

Background: Real-time ultrasonographic guidance is standard practice for performing kidney biopsies and is also used to identify post-biopsy bleeding complications. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of provider-performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in identifying post-biopsy bleeding complications. Methods: Adult patients undergoing outpatient ultrasound (U/S)-guided native kidney biopsy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between August 2022 – June 2023 were included in the study. Immediate post-biopsy and 4-hour post-biopsy U/S imaging were performed by U/S technicians. POCUS assessments by the nephrology provider were conducted upon patient arrival to the recovery bay and 4 hours post-biopsy. The nephrology provider was blinded to the findings of the U/S technician. Presence of hematoma, hematoma size, presence of vascular jet, and presence of intra-renal arteriovenous fistula were documented. The prevalence of each complication and sensitivity and specificity of POCUS were calculated. Results: A total of 82 patients were enrolled. Average age of participants was 55.2 years (SD: 16.5), BMI 28.8 (SD: 6.1), 54.9% were male, 37.8% were Black, and a nephrology attending performed most biopsies (86.6%). Formal radiology U/S detected hematoma and AV fistula in 20.7% (17) and 3.7% (3) immediately post-biopsy and in 40.2 % (33) and 13.4% (11) at 4-hours. By POCUS, hematoma was detected in 19.5% (16) and AV fistula in 2.4% (2) of patients immediately post-biopsy and in 32.9% (27) and 4.9% (4) of patients at 4 hours. When compared with the formal radiology performed U/S, the sensitivity of POCUS for hematoma detection immediately post-biopsy and at 4 hours was 82.4% (95%CI 56.5-96.2) and 75.8% (95%CI 57.7-88.9), respectively. The specificity was 96.2% (95%CI 89.2-99.6) immediately post-biopsy and 95.9% (95%CI 86.0-99.5) at 4 hours. Inter-rater agreement between POCUS and formal radiology U/S for hematoma detection was 93.9 % (κ 0.81) immediately post-biopsy and 87.8 % (κ 0.74) at 4 hours. Conclusion: Provider-performed POCUS was able to detect post-biopsy bleeding complications with high sensitivity and specificity. This valuable, easily accessible tool should be considered for immediate assessment post-biopsy to expedite decision-making at the bedside. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the utility of POCUS to determine appropriateness for discharge after kidney biopsy.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.