Bridging the Future: Perspectives of a Multinational Group of Nephrologists on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in CKD Management

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning, have made significant strides in predicting and diagnosing chronic kidney disease. This study aims to explore the perceptions of a multinational group of nephrologists regarding the application of AI in clinical practice. Understanding their views is crucial for the integration of AI in nephrology. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted in March 2024, involving nephrologists from 17 countries across four continents, all affiliated with a large hemodialysis provider. The survey, validated by 6 nephrologists, comprised 8 technical questions using a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to "totally disagree" and 5 to "totally agree." Demographic data were also collected. Results presented as mean±standard deviation or proportions, as appropriate. T-test was used for statistical analysis, with a p-value below 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 196 valid responses, 80% of nephrologists recognized the term "AI," and 65% were familiar with "ML." Nephrologists acknowledge the potential of AI in the future but currently rely more on traditional tools to support the clinical decision-making process (3.74±1.14 vs. 3.12±1.07, p<0.05). This reliance on traditional tools is more evident among nephrologists not familiar with the term “ML” (3.90±0.93 vs. 3.09±1.01, p<0.05). When asked about the advantages of AI and ML in supporting clinical decision-making, the highest score was attributed to “simplification of decision algorithms” (3.82±1.10). Interestingly, nephrologists without previous contact with AI-supported decision-making tools considered the role of AI less significant in “assisting in making decisions, allowing concentration on high-value activities”, compared to those with previous experience in this area (3.38±1.22 vs. 3.88±0.97, p<0.05). Conclusion: Enhancing the understanding of AI can facilitate the integration of these technologies into nephrology practice, benefiting patient care. Given the perceived potential of AI in managing different types of CKD patients, efforts to promote AI literacy in the nephrology community may be fundamental for the adoption of these tools in regular clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024pxc6qwbk
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Future: Perspectives of a Multinational Group of Nephrologists on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in CKD Management

Luı́s Rodrigues, Carla Santos-Araújo, Eliana Silva, Fernando Macário et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Bridging the Future: Perspectives of a Multinational Group of Nephrologists on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in CKD Management

Luı́s Rodrigues, Carla Santos-Araújo, Eliana Silva, Fernando Macário, Lídia Santos, Jesús Garrido, Carlos Lucas
article en

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning, have made significant strides in predicting and diagnosing chronic kidney disease. This study aims to explore the perceptions of a multinational group of nephrologists regarding the application of AI in clinical practice. Understanding their views is crucial for the integration of AI in nephrology. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted in March 2024, involving nephrologists from 17 countries across four continents, all affiliated with a large hemodialysis provider. The survey, validated by 6 nephrologists, comprised 8 technical questions using a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to "totally disagree" and 5 to "totally agree." Demographic data were also collected. Results presented as mean±standard deviation or proportions, as appropriate. T-test was used for statistical analysis, with a p-value below 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 196 valid responses, 80% of nephrologists recognized the term "AI," and 65% were familiar with "ML." Nephrologists acknowledge the potential of AI in the future but currently rely more on traditional tools to support the clinical decision-making process (3.74±1.14 vs. 3.12±1.07, p<0.05). This reliance on traditional tools is more evident among nephrologists not familiar with the term “ML” (3.90±0.93 vs. 3.09±1.01, p<0.05). When asked about the advantages of AI and ML in supporting clinical decision-making, the highest score was attributed to “simplification of decision algorithms” (3.82±1.10). Interestingly, nephrologists without previous contact with AI-supported decision-making tools considered the role of AI less significant in “assisting in making decisions, allowing concentration on high-value activities”, compared to those with previous experience in this area (3.38±1.22 vs. 3.88±0.97, p<0.05). Conclusion: Enhancing the understanding of AI can facilitate the integration of these technologies into nephrology practice, benefiting patient care. Given the perceived potential of AI in managing different types of CKD patients, efforts to promote AI literacy in the nephrology community may be fundamental for the adoption of these tools in regular clinical practice.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
InnoVentum (Sweden) (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.