Creation and Validation of the Facial Diplegia Scale for Assessment of Bilateral Facial Palsy

<b>Objectives</b>: House-Brackmann (HB) classification and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS), both reference tools for the assessment of facial palsy, are not suitable for bilateral facial palsy. The aim of this study was to develop, standardize, and validate the Facial Diplegia Scale (FDS). <b>Methods</b>: The FDS was standardized in a healthy population (<i>n</i> = 111) and validated in 40 patients with diplegia. Correlations with the SFGS were sought to prove its criterion validity. The comparison between healthy subjects and patients with diplegia was used to test the construct validity. The diagnostic performance of the FDS was verified using an ROC curve based on the HB classification. Internal and external consistency were investigated. <b>Results</b>: The FDS and the SFGS were significantly correlated for the right hemiface [F(39) = 51.51, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.575] as well as for the left one [F(39) = 95.10, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.714]. A significant difference between control subjects and patients with diplegia was found [<i>t</i>(149) = -9.95, <i>p</i> < 0.0001]. Good specificity and sensitivity were confirmed. Finally, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability were largely proven. <b>Conclusions</b>: The FDS has been standardized and validated for the subjective assessment of facial diplegia in adults to improve comprehensive assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0162
Primary Topic
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creation and Validation of the Facial Diplegia Scale for Assessment of Bilateral Facial Palsy

Peggy Gatignol, F. Tankéré, Élodie Lannadère, Diane Picard et al.
Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
article

Creation and Validation of the Facial Diplegia Scale for Assessment of Bilateral Facial Palsy

Peggy Gatignol, F. Tankéré, Élodie Lannadère, Diane Picard, Rémi Hervochon, Marta Calvo, Cloe Cabos, Loeiza Gourves
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: House-Brackmann (HB) classification and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS), both reference tools for the assessment of facial palsy, are not suitable for bilateral facial palsy. The aim of this study was to develop, standardize, and validate the Facial Diplegia Scale (FDS). <b>Methods</b>: The FDS was standardized in a healthy population (<i>n</i> = 111) and validated in 40 patients with diplegia. Correlations with the SFGS were sought to prove its criterion validity. The comparison between healthy subjects and patients with diplegia was used to test the construct validity. The diagnostic performance of the FDS was verified using an ROC curve based on the HB classification. Internal and external consistency were investigated. <b>Results</b>: The FDS and the SFGS were significantly correlated for the right hemiface [F(39) = 51.51, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.575] as well as for the left one [F(39) = 95.10, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.714]. A significant difference between control subjects and patients with diplegia was found [<i>t</i>(149) = -9.95, <i>p</i> < 0.0001]. Good specificity and sensitivity were confirmed. Finally, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability were largely proven. <b>Conclusions</b>: The FDS has been standardized and validated for the subjective assessment of facial diplegia in adults to improve comprehensive assessment.

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic MedicineVol. 27(3)
Inserm (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.