Intuitionistic Implication and Logics of Formal Inconsistency

Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFI for short) are a class of paraconsistent logics that validate the principle of gentle explosion, meaning that any formula can be derived from the set of formulas: ∘α, α and ∼α. A unique feature of LFI is the use of the symbol ‘∘’ to represent notions of consistency at the object-language level. These logics are simple in essence, built upon all the axiom schemas of positive classical logic, axioms for negation and the so-called ‘consistency operator’ ∘, with the only inference rule being detachment. In this paper, we propose an alternative foundation for LFI, which is the positive fragment of intuitionistic propositional logic. We present bi-valuational ‘Loparić-like’ semantics for the resulting logics and discuss their potential extensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Axioms
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13110738
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intuitionistic Implication and Logics of Formal Inconsistency

Janusz Ciuciura
2 citations
Axioms
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
0.69
article

Intuitionistic Implication and Logics of Formal Inconsistency

Janusz Ciuciura
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFI for short) are a class of paraconsistent logics that validate the principle of gentle explosion, meaning that any formula can be derived from the set of formulas: ∘α, α and ∼α. A unique feature of LFI is the use of the symbol ‘∘’ to represent notions of consistency at the object-language level. These logics are simple in essence, built upon all the axiom schemas of positive classical logic, axioms for negation and the so-called ‘consistency operator’ ∘, with the only inference rule being detachment. In this paper, we propose an alternative foundation for LFI, which is the positive fragment of intuitionistic propositional logic. We present bi-valuational ‘Loparić-like’ semantics for the resulting logics and discuss their potential extensions.

AxiomsVol. 13(11)
University of Łódź (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.