The acute procedural results and subsequent clinical outcomes after CTO-PCI: main-analysis of the japanese CTO-PCI expert registry

Abstract Background The prospective and nonrandomized registry by Japanese Board of chronic total occlusion (CTO) experts has been finished. The large-scale clinical data related with acute procedural results and subsequent clinical outcomes after CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. Objectives The aim of this study was to make clear the procedural results comparing the different primary CTO-PCI approaches and the clinical outcomes after successful CTO-PCI. Methods Between January 2014 and December 2022, a total of 11,674 CTO-PCI patients were consecutively enrolled in this registry. We compared the acute procedural results between 2 groups; primary antegrade approach (PAA) versus primary retrograde approach (PRA), following the intention-to-treat principle. The key outcome of interest was a technical success that was defined as successful stent implantation, residual diameter stenosis <30% within the treated segment, and restoration of TIMI grade 3 flow. The clinical outcomes after achieving technical success of CTO-PCI were assessed in terms of major adverse clinical events (MACE) that were composed of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, the technical failed factors were also investigated with multivariate analyses. Results Of overall, the technical success rate was 91.9%, but there were significant differences between PAA and PRA groups in terms of the success rate (93.2% vs 88.3%; p < 0.001). The success rates of switching strategy to final antegrade approach after retrograde failure were very low among both groups (PAA; 55.8%, PRA; 68.1%). Of retrograde success group, the successful channel tracking tended to using septal and graft route (70.8% vs 56.0%; p < 0.001). Severe calcification and tortuosity of CTO lesion were stronger predictors of failed CTO-PCI than the other factors of J-CTO score. Also, The median follow-up duration was 446.7±613.4 days. At 1 year, the clinical incidence of MACE was 9.4%. The individual components of MACE were also shown lower rates (All-cause death; 2.6%, MI; 0.8%, TLR; 6.3%). Conclusions In this large cohort of Japanese CTO-PCI registry, CTO-PCI by highly experienced specialists achieved a high technical success rate and clinical impacts. Retrograde approach has been a key to technical success of CTO-PCI in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2424
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The acute procedural results and subsequent clinical outcomes after CTO-PCI: main-analysis of the japanese CTO-PCI expert registry

Yuko Igarashi, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Hiroharu Matsuda, Etsuo Tsuchikane et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

The acute procedural results and subsequent clinical outcomes after CTO-PCI: main-analysis of the japanese CTO-PCI expert registry

Yuko Igarashi, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Hiroharu Matsuda, Etsuo Tsuchikane, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Y. OIKAWA
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The prospective and nonrandomized registry by Japanese Board of chronic total occlusion (CTO) experts has been finished. The large-scale clinical data related with acute procedural results and subsequent clinical outcomes after CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. Objectives The aim of this study was to make clear the procedural results comparing the different primary CTO-PCI approaches and the clinical outcomes after successful CTO-PCI. Methods Between January 2014 and December 2022, a total of 11,674 CTO-PCI patients were consecutively enrolled in this registry. We compared the acute procedural results between 2 groups; primary antegrade approach (PAA) versus primary retrograde approach (PRA), following the intention-to-treat principle. The key outcome of interest was a technical success that was defined as successful stent implantation, residual diameter stenosis <30% within the treated segment, and restoration of TIMI grade 3 flow. The clinical outcomes after achieving technical success of CTO-PCI were assessed in terms of major adverse clinical events (MACE) that were composed of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, the technical failed factors were also investigated with multivariate analyses. Results Of overall, the technical success rate was 91.9%, but there were significant differences between PAA and PRA groups in terms of the success rate (93.2% vs 88.3%; p < 0.001). The success rates of switching strategy to final antegrade approach after retrograde failure were very low among both groups (PAA; 55.8%, PRA; 68.1%). Of retrograde success group, the successful channel tracking tended to using septal and graft route (70.8% vs 56.0%; p < 0.001). Severe calcification and tortuosity of CTO lesion were stronger predictors of failed CTO-PCI than the other factors of J-CTO score. Also, The median follow-up duration was 446.7±613.4 days. At 1 year, the clinical incidence of MACE was 9.4%. The individual components of MACE were also shown lower rates (All-cause death; 2.6%, MI; 0.8%, TLR; 6.3%). Conclusions In this large cohort of Japanese CTO-PCI registry, CTO-PCI by highly experienced specialists achieved a high technical success rate and clinical impacts. Retrograde approach has been a key to technical success of CTO-PCI in this study.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Cardiovascular Institute Hospital (JP), Kurashiki Central Hospital (JP), Koga Hospital (JP), Sapporo Kosei General Hospital (JP), Toyohashi Heart Center (JP), Nagoya Heart Center (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.