‘A wing in the throat’: Negotiating edibility in everyday insect consumption

• The edibility of novel foods like insects is contested among consumers. • The paper explores how consumers engage with edible insect foods in daily life. • The edibility of insects was negotiated in consumers’ everyday food practices. • Product type, implementation context, and social setting affected notions of edibility. • Insects must be considered palatable and appropriate to be accepted in practice. This paper contributes to the ‘geographies of edibility’ by investigating everyday edibility negotiations around edible insect foods in Norway. Edible insects are positioned as an ‘alternative protein’ for the future with the potential to substitute conventional meat. Though already consumed in many parts of the world, insects are considered a novel food in the Global North, and their edibility remains a point of contention among consumers. Extensive research documents consumers’ attitudes towards, and reported willingness to eat, insects. However, less attention has been paid to how consumers engage with insect foods outside of artificial settings. Addressing this gap, the present paper explores how the edibility of edible insects is negotiated by consumers in everyday life. The paper reports on an exploratory food intervention in which ten households were recruited to experiment with commercially available insect foods for two weeks and record their experience through logging, photography, and reflection. The results demonstrate the crucial role of embodied everyday practices in mediating participants’ experience of dealing with insects, supporting a relational view of edibility. Not only the material properties of foods but also embodied experiences and socialised norms around eating contribute towards constructing insects as (in)appropriate and legitimate food. The paper’s findings have implications for the theorisation of edibility formation, and for our understanding of edible insects’ possible role as a meat replacer in the protein transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104132
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Insect Utilization and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘A wing in the throat’: Negotiating edibility in everyday insect consumption

Johannes Volden
7 citations
Geoforum
Insect Utilization and Effects
3.78
article

‘A wing in the throat’: Negotiating edibility in everyday insect consumption

Johannes Volden
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• The edibility of novel foods like insects is contested among consumers. • The paper explores how consumers engage with edible insect foods in daily life. • The edibility of insects was negotiated in consumers’ everyday food practices. • Product type, implementation context, and social setting affected notions of edibility. • Insects must be considered palatable and appropriate to be accepted in practice. This paper contributes to the ‘geographies of edibility’ by investigating everyday edibility negotiations around edible insect foods in Norway. Edible insects are positioned as an ‘alternative protein’ for the future with the potential to substitute conventional meat. Though already consumed in many parts of the world, insects are considered a novel food in the Global North, and their edibility remains a point of contention among consumers. Extensive research documents consumers’ attitudes towards, and reported willingness to eat, insects. However, less attention has been paid to how consumers engage with insect foods outside of artificial settings. Addressing this gap, the present paper explores how the edibility of edible insects is negotiated by consumers in everyday life. The paper reports on an exploratory food intervention in which ten households were recruited to experiment with commercially available insect foods for two weeks and record their experience through logging, photography, and reflection. The results demonstrate the crucial role of embodied everyday practices in mediating participants’ experience of dealing with insects, supporting a relational view of edibility. Not only the material properties of foods but also embodied experiences and socialised norms around eating contribute towards constructing insects as (in)appropriate and legitimate food. The paper’s findings have implications for the theorisation of edibility formation, and for our understanding of edible insects’ possible role as a meat replacer in the protein transition.

GeoforumVol. 157
University of Oslo (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Insect Utilization and Effects
3.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.