Prognostic implications of right and left atrial strain in diabetes mellitus without coronary artery diseases

Abstract Background 2D- speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) has recently be used to assess subclinical myocardial dysfunction, however its utility in diabetes mellitus (DM) has been specifically focusing on the longitudinal systolic function of the left ventricle (LV). Aim To assess the prognostic relation between left (LA) and right (RA) systolic and diastolic strain parameters with clinical outcome in patients with DM. Methods Of the initial 1721 diabetic patients screened for this study only 502 consecutive patients with DM were eligible and retrospectively enrolled, and 2D-STE strain parameters assessed on the 2D-TTE images. All patients were prospectively followed for development of new outcome/cardiac events which included hospitalization for acute HF, CVS-related death, new onset AF/AFI, stroke, heart transplantation, or need for ventricular assist device implantation. The 2D-STE analysis was used to measure the peak LA (longitudinal, radial and circumferential) and RA (longitudinal) strain. The long-term outcomes were evaluated for all-cause CVS outcomes and recurrent hospitalization. Results For the 502 eligible patients [mean age:58±4; 58 % male sex], 221 reached the combined endpoint. Mean follow-up was 1.1±0.6years. Both LA and RA strain parameters were significantly impaired compared to normal standard references (p<.0001), the RA was more impaired than LA strain parameters. The best performance parameters predictive of CVS (combined outcomes) events were for LA>RA systolic and diastolic strain, global RA systolic and diastolic strain (AUC: 0.74 and 70) and global LA longitudinal systolic and diastolic strain (AUC: 0.86 and 0.77). The strongest association between the degree of atrial myocardial mechanical dysfunction and risk of cardiovascular events was more evident for LA strain (free wall > global strain) and lesser extend to RA strain. More myocardial mechanical strain impairments were demonstrated in those with higher left atrial volume index (LAVI), NYHA ≥II class, significantly impaired diastolic function, lower strain values (LA, LV, RV), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), p<.001). The LA (free wall) strain impairment was the independent predictors of combined outcome (including survival) after multiple adjustments using different models. Conclusion Patients with DM, LA strain parameters are stronger predictors of outcome than RA and other conventional parameters and should be included for regular clinical screening DM patients as these parameters provide a stronger prognostic stratification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2774
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic implications of right and left atrial strain in diabetes mellitus without coronary artery diseases

Mamotabo R Matshela
1 citations
European Heart Journal
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
0.40
article

Prognostic implications of right and left atrial strain in diabetes mellitus without coronary artery diseases

Mamotabo R Matshela
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background 2D- speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) has recently be used to assess subclinical myocardial dysfunction, however its utility in diabetes mellitus (DM) has been specifically focusing on the longitudinal systolic function of the left ventricle (LV). Aim To assess the prognostic relation between left (LA) and right (RA) systolic and diastolic strain parameters with clinical outcome in patients with DM. Methods Of the initial 1721 diabetic patients screened for this study only 502 consecutive patients with DM were eligible and retrospectively enrolled, and 2D-STE strain parameters assessed on the 2D-TTE images. All patients were prospectively followed for development of new outcome/cardiac events which included hospitalization for acute HF, CVS-related death, new onset AF/AFI, stroke, heart transplantation, or need for ventricular assist device implantation. The 2D-STE analysis was used to measure the peak LA (longitudinal, radial and circumferential) and RA (longitudinal) strain. The long-term outcomes were evaluated for all-cause CVS outcomes and recurrent hospitalization. Results For the 502 eligible patients [mean age:58±4; 58 % male sex], 221 reached the combined endpoint. Mean follow-up was 1.1±0.6years. Both LA and RA strain parameters were significantly impaired compared to normal standard references (p<.0001), the RA was more impaired than LA strain parameters. The best performance parameters predictive of CVS (combined outcomes) events were for LA>RA systolic and diastolic strain, global RA systolic and diastolic strain (AUC: 0.74 and 70) and global LA longitudinal systolic and diastolic strain (AUC: 0.86 and 0.77). The strongest association between the degree of atrial myocardial mechanical dysfunction and risk of cardiovascular events was more evident for LA strain (free wall > global strain) and lesser extend to RA strain. More myocardial mechanical strain impairments were demonstrated in those with higher left atrial volume index (LAVI), NYHA ≥II class, significantly impaired diastolic function, lower strain values (LA, LV, RV), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), p<.001). The LA (free wall) strain impairment was the independent predictors of combined outcome (including survival) after multiple adjustments using different models. Conclusion Patients with DM, LA strain parameters are stronger predictors of outcome than RA and other conventional parameters and should be included for regular clinical screening DM patients as these parameters provide a stronger prognostic stratification.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.