Residual risk post acute coronary syndroms after 1 year of cardiac rehabilitation. Can we improve it?

Abstract How much do we reduce residual risk with a cardiac rehabilitation program? What is left to do? Which would be the impact of a lower cholesterol threshold for the use of more potent lipid lowering drugs on residual risk? We explored these issues. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical and biochemical data from patients after 1 year of cardiac rehabilitation following an acute coronary event. Changes in residual risk of combined myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death, and its modification with optimization of treatment in patients with suboptimal lipid control, and with the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in those with a LDL-cholesterol over 70 mg/dl, were estimated using the SMART-REACH model calculator. Wilcoson and McNemar tests for paired-samples were used in the statistical análisis. Results 262 consecutive patients were included. Median age was 63.5 years, 80.5% men, 89.3% stented. Baseline use of high intensity statins was 90.8%. After 1 year, the use of Ezetimibe was doubled to 77.1%, empaglifozin to 26%, and PCSK inhibitors were used only in 5%, with a residual use of colchicine. Blood pressure and Cholesterol profile improved after 1 year, with no change in HbA1c. Absolute 10- years and life-long residual risk were reduced 4.8% (95%CI:3.6-5.9) and 6% (95%IC: 4.5-7.5) respectively (both p<0.001). LDL-cholesterol was >55 mg/dl with a suboptimal lipid lowering treatment in 29.8% of patients: an optimization to higher dose of rosuvastatin/atorvastatin plus ezetimibe would decrease absolute 10-years and life-long residual risk in 7.2% (95%CI: 4.9-9.4) and 9.9% (95%CI: 6.4-13.5%) respectively (both p<0.001). LDL-cholesterol remained > 70 mg/dl after higher dose of statin plus ezetimibe in 13.7% of patients: use of PCSK9 inhibitors in this group would reduce absolute 10-year and life-long residual risk in an additional 5.4% (95%CI:2.4-7,6;p=0,018) and 7% (95%CI: 3,8-10,1) compared to maximal dose of statins plus ezetimibe. Conclusions Cardiac rehabilitation programs reduce cardiac risk 1 year after an acute coronary event. Residual risk remain very high, and a significant proportion of patients do not reach recommended targets and optimal lipid lowering treatment. Optimization of lipid lowering drugs, and a lower LDL-cholesterol threshold for the use of PCSK9 inhibitors, would have a significant impact on residual risk.Changes in residual riskPCSK9-inhibitors in LDLchol >70 mg/dl

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2777
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residual risk post acute coronary syndroms after 1 year of cardiac rehabilitation. Can we improve it?

Raúl Gascueña Rubia, C. de Blas, María Molina, Belén Jiménez Azzaoui et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Residual risk post acute coronary syndroms after 1 year of cardiac rehabilitation. Can we improve it?

Raúl Gascueña Rubia, C. de Blas, María Molina, Belén Jiménez Azzaoui, R Ruesgas, Teresa Morales, J Gomez Diego
article en

Abstract

Abstract How much do we reduce residual risk with a cardiac rehabilitation program? What is left to do? Which would be the impact of a lower cholesterol threshold for the use of more potent lipid lowering drugs on residual risk? We explored these issues. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical and biochemical data from patients after 1 year of cardiac rehabilitation following an acute coronary event. Changes in residual risk of combined myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death, and its modification with optimization of treatment in patients with suboptimal lipid control, and with the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in those with a LDL-cholesterol over 70 mg/dl, were estimated using the SMART-REACH model calculator. Wilcoson and McNemar tests for paired-samples were used in the statistical análisis. Results 262 consecutive patients were included. Median age was 63.5 years, 80.5% men, 89.3% stented. Baseline use of high intensity statins was 90.8%. After 1 year, the use of Ezetimibe was doubled to 77.1%, empaglifozin to 26%, and PCSK inhibitors were used only in 5%, with a residual use of colchicine. Blood pressure and Cholesterol profile improved after 1 year, with no change in HbA1c. Absolute 10- years and life-long residual risk were reduced 4.8% (95%CI:3.6-5.9) and 6% (95%IC: 4.5-7.5) respectively (both p<0.001). LDL-cholesterol was >55 mg/dl with a suboptimal lipid lowering treatment in 29.8% of patients: an optimization to higher dose of rosuvastatin/atorvastatin plus ezetimibe would decrease absolute 10-years and life-long residual risk in 7.2% (95%CI: 4.9-9.4) and 9.9% (95%CI: 6.4-13.5%) respectively (both p<0.001). LDL-cholesterol remained > 70 mg/dl after higher dose of statin plus ezetimibe in 13.7% of patients: use of PCSK9 inhibitors in this group would reduce absolute 10-year and life-long residual risk in an additional 5.4% (95%CI:2.4-7,6;p=0,018) and 7% (95%CI: 3,8-10,1) compared to maximal dose of statins plus ezetimibe. Conclusions Cardiac rehabilitation programs reduce cardiac risk 1 year after an acute coronary event. Residual risk remain very high, and a significant proportion of patients do not reach recommended targets and optimal lipid lowering treatment. Optimization of lipid lowering drugs, and a lower LDL-cholesterol threshold for the use of PCSK9 inhibitors, would have a significant impact on residual risk.Changes in residual riskPCSK9-inhibitors in LDLchol >70 mg/dl

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.