Do more with less? Impact of personalized very low doses of amlodipine in the PERSONAL-CovidBP trial

Abstract Introduction The Personal-CovidBP study1 tested remote patient use of a drug-device combination of a smartphone application (App) to record blood pressure (BP), novel personalized milligram-by-milligram drug (amlodipine) dose, and relevant side effects daily during the COVID-19 pandemic. Purpose In supplementary data analyses, we examined the effect of using small doses (1 mg) and small increments (1-2 mg) of amlodipine on the BP response and side effects. Methods In this community-based trial with remote monitoring and remote medical management from the investigational site, hypertensive participants aged 18 years + with poor BP control (prior 7 day mean of 135 mmHg systolic BP or above and/or 85 mmHg diastolic BP and above) were enrolled to intervention with open label dose titration over 14 weeks, allowing personalized dosing of liquid amlodipine (1–2 mg steps from 1–10 mg daily). Results 205 patients were enrolled into the intervention group between October 2020 and July 2021. Average BP in intervention fell from 141/87 to 131/81 (difference −10/6 p < 0.001). Even low doses or small increments: 1 or 2 mg amlodipine or 5 mg to 6 mg, produced meaningful BP responses. Here we report that the addition of amlodipine during the study reduced blood pressure regardless of being amlodipine naive at baseline (n=141), or receiving amlodipine 2.5mg or 5mg at baseline (n=62). The response slopes were comparable, and mean reductions in SBP were consistent across groups: -11.7 (95% CI: -12.9 to -10.6); -9.4 (-11.1 to -7.7); respectively (Figure 1). For the amlodipine naive, the majority (76%) achieved BP control at low doses (<1 to 3mg) with occurrence of side effects increasing with dose (Figure 2). Conclusions Our real-world remote care study demonstrated that very low doses of amlodipine as little as 1 mg were effective and for 1mg-3mg gained BP control in the majority and were associated with fewer side effects which is consistent with previous meta-analyses.2 Personalized treatment titration was effective even at very low doses and also regardless of whether amlodipine naive or not at baseline.Changes in SBP- baseline amlodipine useAmlodipine dose at control vs oedema

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2595
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do more with less? Impact of personalized very low doses of amlodipine in the PERSONAL-CovidBP trial

Mike Taylor, Portia Goldsmith, Thomas Godec, Rhian Gabe et al.
European Heart Journal
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Do more with less? Impact of personalized very low doses of amlodipine in the PERSONAL-CovidBP trial

Mike Taylor, Portia Goldsmith, Thomas Godec, Rhian Gabe, Julian Shiel, David Collier, M.H. Patel, Mark J. Caulfield, Richard J. McManus, Nicholas Deeming, Neil Poulter, Manjari Saxena
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The Personal-CovidBP study1 tested remote patient use of a drug-device combination of a smartphone application (App) to record blood pressure (BP), novel personalized milligram-by-milligram drug (amlodipine) dose, and relevant side effects daily during the COVID-19 pandemic. Purpose In supplementary data analyses, we examined the effect of using small doses (1 mg) and small increments (1-2 mg) of amlodipine on the BP response and side effects. Methods In this community-based trial with remote monitoring and remote medical management from the investigational site, hypertensive participants aged 18 years + with poor BP control (prior 7 day mean of 135 mmHg systolic BP or above and/or 85 mmHg diastolic BP and above) were enrolled to intervention with open label dose titration over 14 weeks, allowing personalized dosing of liquid amlodipine (1–2 mg steps from 1–10 mg daily). Results 205 patients were enrolled into the intervention group between October 2020 and July 2021. Average BP in intervention fell from 141/87 to 131/81 (difference −10/6 p < 0.001). Even low doses or small increments: 1 or 2 mg amlodipine or 5 mg to 6 mg, produced meaningful BP responses. Here we report that the addition of amlodipine during the study reduced blood pressure regardless of being amlodipine naive at baseline (n=141), or receiving amlodipine 2.5mg or 5mg at baseline (n=62). The response slopes were comparable, and mean reductions in SBP were consistent across groups: -11.7 (95% CI: -12.9 to -10.6); -9.4 (-11.1 to -7.7); respectively (Figure 1). For the amlodipine naive, the majority (76%) achieved BP control at low doses (<1 to 3mg) with occurrence of side effects increasing with dose (Figure 2). Conclusions Our real-world remote care study demonstrated that very low doses of amlodipine as little as 1 mg were effective and for 1mg-3mg gained BP control in the majority and were associated with fewer side effects which is consistent with previous meta-analyses.2 Personalized treatment titration was effective even at very low doses and also regardless of whether amlodipine naive or not at baseline.Changes in SBP- baseline amlodipine useAmlodipine dose at control vs oedema

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Oxford (GB), William Harvey Research Institute (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.