Building search and analytical competences of master’s students for scientific reviewing

Today, scientific reviewing is not the area of strength of Russian researchers. In many ways, it is due to the lack of research competences taught to the graduate students, and, in particular, search and analytical competences that correspond to the active-operational component of the competence. To overcome this shortcoming, the authors have developed and tested an approach to selecting publications for scientific reviewing. The approach comprises five steps: selecting the starting sample, its expansion, truncation, analysis, and final selection. The pedagogical experiment accomplished with the small groups demonstrated significant increase in the level of research competences in the master’s students who took the specialized course Science Communication based on the above approach. The course resulted in increased competences essential for effective search and analysis of scientific information. Further implementation of the method will improve the educational environment for building research competences in graduate students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific and Technical Libraries
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2024-10-34-58
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building search and analytical competences of master’s students for scientific reviewing

A. E. Rykhtorova, P. Yu. Blinov, A. Е. Guskov, A. V. Malysheva
Scientific and Technical Libraries
Engineering Education and Technology
article

Building search and analytical competences of master’s students for scientific reviewing

A. E. Rykhtorova, P. Yu. Blinov, A. Е. Guskov, A. V. Malysheva
article en

Abstract

Today, scientific reviewing is not the area of strength of Russian researchers. In many ways, it is due to the lack of research competences taught to the graduate students, and, in particular, search and analytical competences that correspond to the active-operational component of the competence. To overcome this shortcoming, the authors have developed and tested an approach to selecting publications for scientific reviewing. The approach comprises five steps: selecting the starting sample, its expansion, truncation, analysis, and final selection. The pedagogical experiment accomplished with the small groups demonstrated significant increase in the level of research competences in the master’s students who took the specialized course Science Communication based on the above approach. The course resulted in increased competences essential for effective search and analysis of scientific information. Further implementation of the method will improve the educational environment for building research competences in graduate students.

Scientific and Technical Libraries(10)
State Public Scientific Technological Library of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Moscow Institute of Economics Politics and Law (RU), Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Engineering Education and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.