Evaluation of naples prognostic score to predict long-term mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism

Abstract Background/Introduction APE mortality rates are still not satisfactory despite new diagnosis and treatment methods (1). Thus, risk classification is crucial due to the wide range of clinical presentations. Several risk stratifications have been developed such as simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) (2). Nonetheless, there remains a need for an optimal indicator that can be conveniently measured with a high degree of precision to predict clinical outcomes. Naples prognostic score (NPS) is a newly defined index that is developed to determine the prognosis of cancer patients and reflects the inflammatory and nutritional status of the patients (3). Purpose The aim of our study was to determine the long-term prognostic value of NPS in APE patients. Methods Two hundred ninety-three patients diagnosed with APE between November 2016 and February 2022 were included in the study. NPS consists of 4 parameters: serum albumin, total cholesterol (TC) concentration, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Naples scores of all patients were calculated and the patients were divided into 2 groups according to their NPS and their long-term mortality was compared. The primary endpoint of the study was long-term mortality. Results The long-term mortality was observed in 38 patients out of 293 patients in the mean follow-up of 24 (16-42) months. In the low-Naples risk group (group 1), there were 215 patients, while the high-Naples risk group (group 2) had 78 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that NPS as a categorical parameter (HR: 3.458, 95%CI:1.734-6.896, p<0.001), NPS as a numerical parameter, (HR:1.651, 95%CI:1.217-2.241, p=0.001) and simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) (HR:1.887, 95%CI:1.223-2.911), p=0.004) score were independent predictors of long-term mortality. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the model 2 with NPS as continuous had higher discriminative ability than the baseline model for detecting patients with mortality (Area under curve (AUC) values = 0.791 vs. 0.723, respectively, p=0.04) (Figure 1A). The long-term predictive capability of NPS was non-inferior than the sPESI score (Figure 1B). Conclusions The current study highlights that NPS, which reflects systemic inflammation and nutritional status may have potential to predict long-term mortality in APE patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show the relationship between long-term mortality and NPS in APE patients.