Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the management of left ventricular thrombus after myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis

Abstract Background/Introduction Left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation is not an uncommon complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the modern era of early reperfusion. The optimal anticoagulation regimen in this clinical scenario remains poorly-defined. Purpose The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the management of LV thrombus following AMI. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety outcome data regarding the use of DOACs versus VKAs for patients with LV thrombus after MI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize pooled ORs. Results Eight studies comprising a total of 605 patients were included (Table). DOACs were associated with an almost 2-fold higher likelihood for achieving thrombus resolution compared to VKAs (pooled OR 1.95 [1.25-3.04]; p =0.003, I2 =0 %), while they achieved a 70% lower risk for systemic embolism (pooled OR 0.30 [0.12-0.75]; p =0.01, I2 =0%). The use of DOACs was associated with a 54% lower risk for bleeding compared to VKAs (pooled OR 0.46 [0.26-0.84]; p =0.01, I2 =0 %). Overall, patients receiving DOACs had a 63% lower risk to reach the composite outcome of any bleeding, systemic embolism, cardiovascular hospitalization, or all-cause death, compared with patients using VKAs (pooled OR 0.37 [0.23-0.60]; p <0.0001, I2 =0%) (Figure). Conclusion DOACs appear to have a more favorable efficacy and safety profile compared to VKAs for the management of LV thrombus following AMI.Graphical abstractTable