Three-dimensional transthoracic vs transesophageal echocardiography vs computed tomography angiography aorta for aortic annular diameter measurement for TAVI in our hospital

Abstract Background Tans femoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) was recently the standard treatment option in patient with severe aortic stenosis. All patients undergoing TF-TAVI needed computed tomography angiography (CTA) aorta not only to evaluate entry site but to measure the annulus size to determine the prosthesis valve size. In Siriraj hospital we have protocol to perform Three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D-TTE) and three-dimensional esophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) prior to TF-TAVI. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between conventional CTA aorta vs 3D-TEE vs 3D-TTE aortic annulus size. Method and result We performed a cross sectional study in all patients undergone TF-TAVI in our hospital who had all 3 aortic annulus sizes measured by 3 methods: CTA aorta, 3D-TEE vs 3D-TTE during 2015-2023. For 244 patients underwent TAVI, 52 patients were excluded (22 Transapical approach, 10 valve in valve TAVI, 6 not complete annulus measurement, 6 transcarotid, 3 severe AR, etc.) One hundred sixteen patients were female (60.4%) with average age of 83.2 years old. 98% of patients had comorbid disease; hypertension 84%, dyslipidemia 79%, diabetes 47%, coronary artery disease 55% (9% CABG), 2.6% of patients were bicuspid aortic valve. 27% of patients had LVEF less than 55%, average AVA was 0.71 centimeter-square, average mean pressure gradient was 52.5 mmHg. We analyzed the co-relation between these 3 methods by Bland–Altman plot which revealed the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between CTA Aorta and 3D-TEE was 0.814 with average difference of 0.68 mm (95% limit of agreement –1.68 - 3.04) and r between CTA Aorta and 3D-TTE was 0.442 with average difference of 0.41 mm (95% limit of agreement –3.82 - 4.63) Conclusion 3D-TTE annulus sizing had a reasonable correlation with CTA annulus sizing (Pearson’s correlation of 0.442) while 3D-TEE annulus sizing had a very high correlation with CTA annulus sizing (Pearson’s correlation of 0.814). In patient which CTA was not available to measure annulus size 3D-TEE annulus sizing might be reasonable method to measure the annulus size for TF-TAVI. Keyword trans femoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI), annulus size, three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D-TTE), three-dimensional esophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE), computed tomography angiography (CTA) aorta

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2260
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-dimensional transthoracic vs transesophageal echocardiography vs computed tomography angiography aorta for aortic annular diameter measurement for TAVI in our hospital

Suppavich Kieattisaksopon, Decho Jakrapanichakul, Nattawut Wongpraparut, Adisak Maneesai
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Three-dimensional transthoracic vs transesophageal echocardiography vs computed tomography angiography aorta for aortic annular diameter measurement for TAVI in our hospital

Suppavich Kieattisaksopon, Decho Jakrapanichakul, Nattawut Wongpraparut, Adisak Maneesai
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Tans femoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) was recently the standard treatment option in patient with severe aortic stenosis. All patients undergoing TF-TAVI needed computed tomography angiography (CTA) aorta not only to evaluate entry site but to measure the annulus size to determine the prosthesis valve size. In Siriraj hospital we have protocol to perform Three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D-TTE) and three-dimensional esophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) prior to TF-TAVI. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between conventional CTA aorta vs 3D-TEE vs 3D-TTE aortic annulus size. Method and result We performed a cross sectional study in all patients undergone TF-TAVI in our hospital who had all 3 aortic annulus sizes measured by 3 methods: CTA aorta, 3D-TEE vs 3D-TTE during 2015-2023. For 244 patients underwent TAVI, 52 patients were excluded (22 Transapical approach, 10 valve in valve TAVI, 6 not complete annulus measurement, 6 transcarotid, 3 severe AR, etc.) One hundred sixteen patients were female (60.4%) with average age of 83.2 years old. 98% of patients had comorbid disease; hypertension 84%, dyslipidemia 79%, diabetes 47%, coronary artery disease 55% (9% CABG), 2.6% of patients were bicuspid aortic valve. 27% of patients had LVEF less than 55%, average AVA was 0.71 centimeter-square, average mean pressure gradient was 52.5 mmHg. We analyzed the co-relation between these 3 methods by Bland–Altman plot which revealed the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between CTA Aorta and 3D-TEE was 0.814 with average difference of 0.68 mm (95% limit of agreement –1.68 - 3.04) and r between CTA Aorta and 3D-TTE was 0.442 with average difference of 0.41 mm (95% limit of agreement –3.82 - 4.63) Conclusion 3D-TTE annulus sizing had a reasonable correlation with CTA annulus sizing (Pearson’s correlation of 0.442) while 3D-TEE annulus sizing had a very high correlation with CTA annulus sizing (Pearson’s correlation of 0.814). In patient which CTA was not available to measure annulus size 3D-TEE annulus sizing might be reasonable method to measure the annulus size for TF-TAVI. Keyword trans femoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI), annulus size, three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D-TTE), three-dimensional esophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE), computed tomography angiography (CTA) aorta

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Siriraj Hospital (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.