TAVI-related vascular access complications: are Viabahn stents a good option?

Abstract Background Vascular access complications (VACs) remain one of the biggest challenges when performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Historically, concerns regarding stent placement in flexing points have been a deterrent to the percutaneous treatment of VACs, due to the potential development of claudication over time. The Viabahn stent, being a covered stent that offers flexibility and conformability, may be well-suited for deployment in these anatomies. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the iliofemoral Viabahn stenting for treating TAVI-related VACs. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients submitted to Viabahn stenting in the iliofemoral sector for TAVI-related VACs in a single tertiary centre between January 2017 and October 2023. Baseline characteristics, procedure data and complications were noted according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. Results A total of 722 patients were submitted to transfemoral TAVI during the study period. Of these, 25 (3.6%) underwent Viabahn stenting to treat TAVI-related VACs and were included in this study. Patient mean age was 82.1±6.13 years, 61.2% were male. At the baseline, patients had a mean Euroscore II of 2.73±1.91. A unilateral access approach was used in 40% of cases. The median size of the main access sheath was 14 Fr [IQ 14-16], and the closure devices deployed were Manta® in 72%, and Perclose® in 28%. The Viabahn stent treated different types of VACS, including vessel rupture in 56%, acute dissection in 28% (12% with no antegrade flow), and failed sealing in 16%. The complicated artery was the common femoral in 82%, and the external iliac in 18%. Percutaneous treatment with Viabahn stenting was successful in 92% of cases. In two cases (8%), one of acute occlusion and one of vessel rupture, vascular surgery was required. During the hospital stay, there were no further vascular or hemorrhagic complications. After a mean follow-up of 15 months, 20% of patients were evaluated by Doppler which showed no signs of restenosis or stent complications. Only one patient experienced lower limb claudication at 1 year due to stent restenosis detected in the CT scan, which was managed with medical therapy. There were no other adverse vascular events during follow-up. Conclusion Our study suggests that Viabahn stenting emerges as a valuable therapeutic option, ensuring long-term safety and efficacy, in the complex realm of TAVI-related vascular complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2441
Primary Topic
Vascular Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TAVI-related vascular access complications: are Viabahn stents a good option?

A Grazina, Bernardo Corrêa de Almeida Teixeira, Leonardo Fiúsa de Morais, Rúben Ramos et al.
European Heart Journal
Vascular Procedures and Complications
article

TAVI-related vascular access complications: are Viabahn stents a good option?

A Grazina, Bernardo Corrêa de Almeida Teixeira, Leonardo Fiúsa de Morais, Rúben Ramos, A Castelo, R Teixeira, Duarte Cacela, António José Fiarresga, Inês Rodrigues, T Mendonca, R Cruz Ferreira, A Ferreira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Vascular access complications (VACs) remain one of the biggest challenges when performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Historically, concerns regarding stent placement in flexing points have been a deterrent to the percutaneous treatment of VACs, due to the potential development of claudication over time. The Viabahn stent, being a covered stent that offers flexibility and conformability, may be well-suited for deployment in these anatomies. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the iliofemoral Viabahn stenting for treating TAVI-related VACs. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients submitted to Viabahn stenting in the iliofemoral sector for TAVI-related VACs in a single tertiary centre between January 2017 and October 2023. Baseline characteristics, procedure data and complications were noted according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. Results A total of 722 patients were submitted to transfemoral TAVI during the study period. Of these, 25 (3.6%) underwent Viabahn stenting to treat TAVI-related VACs and were included in this study. Patient mean age was 82.1±6.13 years, 61.2% were male. At the baseline, patients had a mean Euroscore II of 2.73±1.91. A unilateral access approach was used in 40% of cases. The median size of the main access sheath was 14 Fr [IQ 14-16], and the closure devices deployed were Manta® in 72%, and Perclose® in 28%. The Viabahn stent treated different types of VACS, including vessel rupture in 56%, acute dissection in 28% (12% with no antegrade flow), and failed sealing in 16%. The complicated artery was the common femoral in 82%, and the external iliac in 18%. Percutaneous treatment with Viabahn stenting was successful in 92% of cases. In two cases (8%), one of acute occlusion and one of vessel rupture, vascular surgery was required. During the hospital stay, there were no further vascular or hemorrhagic complications. After a mean follow-up of 15 months, 20% of patients were evaluated by Doppler which showed no signs of restenosis or stent complications. Only one patient experienced lower limb claudication at 1 year due to stent restenosis detected in the CT scan, which was managed with medical therapy. There were no other adverse vascular events during follow-up. Conclusion Our study suggests that Viabahn stenting emerges as a valuable therapeutic option, ensuring long-term safety and efficacy, in the complex realm of TAVI-related vascular complications.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Hospital de Santa Marta (PT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Vascular Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.