Intracardiac vs transesophageal echocardiography for percutaneous LAA occlusion: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is typically performed under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) appears to be a potential alternative to guide implantation. Purpose We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing ICE and TEE for endocardial LAAO. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar regarding published abstracts and manuscripts on July 1, 2023. Studies reporting clinical outcomes comparing ICE vs TEE for endocardial LAAO were included. Results A total of 16 studies with 123,444 patients (ICE-5,122 patients and TEE-122,667 patients) (mean age 75±4 years, 59%male) fulfilled the criteria. Five included Watchman, four included the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug/ Amulet device, and seven included both devices. There was no significant difference in CHA2DS2VASC or HAS-BLED scores between both groups. Outcomes assessed including procedural success between ICE vs TEE (risk ratio [RR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01), fluoroscopy time (mean difference [MD], 1.25 minutes; 95% CI, -1.63- 4.14) and total procedure time (MD, −3.74 minutes; 95% CI, − 13.42-5.94) were found to be similar between both groups. There was also no significant difference in complications including vascular complications, bleeding events, device embolization, and stroke between both groups. Of note, patients undergoing LAA closure under ICE guidance had higher risk for pericardial effusion and/or cardiac tamponade compared to those in the TEE group (RR 1.72; 95% CI, 1.32-2.23). Conclusions Although TEE is the gold standard for perioperative guidance of LAAO, imaging with ICE is a feasible alternative associated with similar efficacy outcomes in LAAO procedures. However, further studies needed to clarify safety of ICE as an alternative perioperative imaging technique.