A Turning Point in the Understanding of the Legal Consequences of the Conclusion of a Preliminary Contract in Latvian Case Law

On 5 July 2023, the Supreme Court (Senate) delivered its judgement in case No. SKC-19/2023, departing from the current case law regarding the legal understanding and legal consequences of a preliminary contract, regulated in Section 1541 of the Civil Law, recognising that both the right to claim conclusion of the main contract and the right to claim compensation for losses could arise from the preliminary contract, as well as providing other important findings, inter alia, regarding the possibility for the claimant to join the claim for conclusion of the main contract in one with the claim for performance of the main contract. This article provides detailed insight into this judgement by the Senate, at the same time referring to the findings made in the current case law and legal literature, as well as pointing to possible future challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.17.16
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Turning Point in the Understanding of the Legal Consequences of the Conclusion of a Preliminary Contract in Latvian Case Law

Germans Pavlovskis, Erlens Kalniņš
JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW
European and International Contract Law
article

A Turning Point in the Understanding of the Legal Consequences of the Conclusion of a Preliminary Contract in Latvian Case Law

Germans Pavlovskis, Erlens Kalniņš
article en

Abstract

On 5 July 2023, the Supreme Court (Senate) delivered its judgement in case No. SKC-19/2023, departing from the current case law regarding the legal understanding and legal consequences of a preliminary contract, regulated in Section 1541 of the Civil Law, recognising that both the right to claim conclusion of the main contract and the right to claim compensation for losses could arise from the preliminary contract, as well as providing other important findings, inter alia, regarding the possibility for the claimant to join the claim for conclusion of the main contract in one with the claim for performance of the main contract. This article provides detailed insight into this judgement by the Senate, at the same time referring to the findings made in the current case law and legal literature, as well as pointing to possible future challenges.

JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAWVol. 17
University of Latvia (LV)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Turning Point in the Understanding of the Legal Consequences of the Conclusion of a Preliminary Contract in Latvian Case Law — Germans Pavlovskis, Erlens Kalniņš · JOURNAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA LAW (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS