Heparin reversal for coronary artery perforation

Abstract Background/Introduction In the management of coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), heparin reversal can provide hemostatic effects but raises concerns about potential coronary thrombosis if an intracoronary artery guidewire or balloon is in place. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of heparin reversal during device insertion for CAP. We also aimed to determine the optimal target activated clotting time (ACT) to maintain when performing heparin reversal. Methods We analyzed cases of CAP which occurred during PCI procedures in a single center from January 2006 to October 2023. Patients were assigned to two groups according to whether they received heparin reversal with a device in place. The safety outcome was the periprocedural myocardial infarction (creatine kinase-MB >5 times the upper normal limit), and the efficacy outcome was successful hemostasis at the end of the procedures (complete absence of CAP on angiography). Results Among the 22,368 cases, 368 (1.6%) developed CAP, consisting of main vessels 45%, distal vessels 43%, and collateral vessels 12%. Heparin reversal with a device in place was implemented in 211 (57%) cases. Of these, 16 (7.6%) experienced coronary thrombosis. After adjusting covariates by the multivariable logistic regression model, heparin reversal with a device in place was significantly associated with a higher incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (11% vs 4.5%; adjusted OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.24–7.78; P = 0.015) and a higher rate of successful hemostasis (91% vs 73%; adjusted OR: 2.78; 95% CI: 1.27–6.09; P = 0.011). In the analysis of cases where minimum ACT value was available (n = 251), this value was significantly correlated with coronary thrombosis (r = −0.16, P = 0.012). When the cutoff values of minimum ACT were set at 200, 150, and 120 seconds as a binomial variable, the correlation coefficient was r = −0.08 (P = 0.158), r = −0.16 (P = 0.009), r = −0.20 (P = 0.001), respectively. Conclusions Heparin reversal after CAP with an intracoronary artery device in place was significantly associated with a higher incidence of periprocedural MI but also a higher rate of successful hemostasis. A minimum ACT value <150 seconds was significantly correlated with coronary thrombosis. These results propose a novel algorithm for CAP management strategies.Management algorithm for CAP

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2414
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heparin reversal for coronary artery perforation

Yuichi Sawayama, Kenta Sasaki, Kohei Osakada, Akihiro Ikuta et al.
European Heart Journal
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Heparin reversal for coronary artery perforation

Yuichi Sawayama, Kenta Sasaki, Kohei Osakada, Akihiro Ikuta, Shunsuke Kubo, Yasushi Fuku, Tomohiro Tada, Kazushige Kadota, Narumi Taninobu, Hiroyuki Tanaka
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction In the management of coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), heparin reversal can provide hemostatic effects but raises concerns about potential coronary thrombosis if an intracoronary artery guidewire or balloon is in place. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of heparin reversal during device insertion for CAP. We also aimed to determine the optimal target activated clotting time (ACT) to maintain when performing heparin reversal. Methods We analyzed cases of CAP which occurred during PCI procedures in a single center from January 2006 to October 2023. Patients were assigned to two groups according to whether they received heparin reversal with a device in place. The safety outcome was the periprocedural myocardial infarction (creatine kinase-MB >5 times the upper normal limit), and the efficacy outcome was successful hemostasis at the end of the procedures (complete absence of CAP on angiography). Results Among the 22,368 cases, 368 (1.6%) developed CAP, consisting of main vessels 45%, distal vessels 43%, and collateral vessels 12%. Heparin reversal with a device in place was implemented in 211 (57%) cases. Of these, 16 (7.6%) experienced coronary thrombosis. After adjusting covariates by the multivariable logistic regression model, heparin reversal with a device in place was significantly associated with a higher incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (11% vs 4.5%; adjusted OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.24–7.78; P = 0.015) and a higher rate of successful hemostasis (91% vs 73%; adjusted OR: 2.78; 95% CI: 1.27–6.09; P = 0.011). In the analysis of cases where minimum ACT value was available (n = 251), this value was significantly correlated with coronary thrombosis (r = −0.16, P = 0.012). When the cutoff values of minimum ACT were set at 200, 150, and 120 seconds as a binomial variable, the correlation coefficient was r = −0.08 (P = 0.158), r = −0.16 (P = 0.009), r = −0.20 (P = 0.001), respectively. Conclusions Heparin reversal after CAP with an intracoronary artery device in place was significantly associated with a higher incidence of periprocedural MI but also a higher rate of successful hemostasis. A minimum ACT value <150 seconds was significantly correlated with coronary thrombosis. These results propose a novel algorithm for CAP management strategies.Management algorithm for CAP

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Kurashiki Central Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.