Pharmacotherapy sequencing strategies for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a cost–utility analysis

<h3>Background</h3> Standard pharmacotherapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) comprises “quadruple therapy” with a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor, a β-blocker, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. Randomized controlled trials evaluating different sequencing strategies for initiating and titrating these medications are lacking. We sought to compare costs for various HFrEF quadruple therapy sequencing strategies. <h3>Methods</h3> We used an individual-based state-transition microsimulation model to compare cost utility for 12 sequencing strategies with either weekly or biweekly medication adjustments for treatment-naive patients with HFrEF. We conducted a probabilistic analysis with a lifetime horizon from the public-payer perspective, along with a deterministic sensitivity analysis and 2 scenario analyses. We estimated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental net monetary benefit (NMB) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of each strategy versus the conventional approach. <h3>Results</h3> Over a lifetime, the 12 strategies resulted in costs ranging from $76 440 to $79 338, QALYs ranging from 9.55 to 9.72, and incremental NMB ranging from $2233 to $6529. Compared with the conventional sequencing strategy of starting and titrating biweekly 1 medication at a time, other strategies had ICERs ranging from $11 175 to $22 492. The simultaneous initiation of all 4 medications with subsequent biweekly adjustment had the highest probability of being the most cost-effective strategy at the specified willingness-to-pay threshold. <h3>Interpretation</h3> Simultaneous initiation of the 4 standard HFrEF medications with biweekly adjustment provided the highest cost utility compared with other strategies. Systems of care are needed to enable rapid initiation and sustained use of HFrEF medications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.240116
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacotherapy sequencing strategies for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a cost–utility analysis

Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Huynh Van Minh, Wei Zhang, Peter Loewen et al.
2 citations
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
0.80
article

Pharmacotherapy sequencing strategies for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a cost–utility analysis

Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Huynh Van Minh, Wei Zhang, Peter Loewen, Nathaniel M. Hawkins, Ricky D. Turgeon
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Standard pharmacotherapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) comprises “quadruple therapy” with a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor, a β-blocker, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. Randomized controlled trials evaluating different sequencing strategies for initiating and titrating these medications are lacking. We sought to compare costs for various HFrEF quadruple therapy sequencing strategies. <h3>Methods</h3> We used an individual-based state-transition microsimulation model to compare cost utility for 12 sequencing strategies with either weekly or biweekly medication adjustments for treatment-naive patients with HFrEF. We conducted a probabilistic analysis with a lifetime horizon from the public-payer perspective, along with a deterministic sensitivity analysis and 2 scenario analyses. We estimated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental net monetary benefit (NMB) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of each strategy versus the conventional approach. <h3>Results</h3> Over a lifetime, the 12 strategies resulted in costs ranging from $76 440 to $79 338, QALYs ranging from 9.55 to 9.72, and incremental NMB ranging from $2233 to $6529. Compared with the conventional sequencing strategy of starting and titrating biweekly 1 medication at a time, other strategies had ICERs ranging from $11 175 to $22 492. The simultaneous initiation of all 4 medications with subsequent biweekly adjustment had the highest probability of being the most cost-effective strategy at the specified willingness-to-pay threshold. <h3>Interpretation</h3> Simultaneous initiation of the 4 standard HFrEF medications with biweekly adjustment provided the highest cost utility compared with other strategies. Systems of care are needed to enable rapid initiation and sustained use of HFrEF medications.

Canadian Medical Association JournalVol. 196(36)
University of British Columbia (CA), Sage (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.