Clinical outcomes according to clinical and surgical risk scores for tricuspid regurgitation

Abstract Background TRIO score, the clinical risk score in significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and TRI-SCORE, the surgical mortality risk for tricuspid valve (TV) surgery, have been proposed. We aimed to investigate the correlation and distribution of two risk scores, and to define the clinical benefit of TV surgery in patients with low or intermediate TRIO score and TRI-SCORE. Methods In a total of 10,054 patients diagnosed with moderate to severe TR between January 2008 to December 2020, TRIO score and TRI-SCORE were stratified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups. Patients of all etiologies of TR were included and patients who underwent prior tricuspid valve surgery were excluded. The clinical outcome was all-cause death. Results TRI-SCORE and TRIO scores were moderately correlated (r =0.39, p<0.001). 9,104 (90.6%) patients (age 67 ± 14 years, 42% male) had low or intermediate TRI and TRIO score. During 12.6 ± 10.1 years, 885 (9.7%) underwent TV surgery and 1,268 (13.9%) experienced clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in clinical outcomes according to TV surgery in both low and intermediate TRIO score patients (log-rank, p<0.001) and sub-analyzed them according to the TRI-SCORE group (Figure). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, TV surgery (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.49, p<0.001) were significantly associated with clinical outcomes after adjusting confounding factors. Conclusions TV surgery is clinically beneficial in moderate to severe TR patients with a low or intermediate TRIO score and TRI-SCORE.