Effects of beta blockers on outcome in patients with PAH with and without comorbid conditions: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (BNP-PL)

Abstract Background The current guidelines do not recommend the use of beta-blockers (BB) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) unless necessitated by comorbidities. However, the evidence regarding the role of BB in PAH is contradictory. This study investigates the effects of BB on clinical outcomes in patients newly diagnosed with PAH, stratified by the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities that justify their use. Methods We analyzed data from 806 patients newly diagnosed with PAH, who were prospectively enrolled from March 1, 2018, to August 31, 2023, in the multicentre registry, Database of Pulmonary Hypertension in the Polish population (BNP-PL). The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and a composite of hospitalization due to right heart exacerbation, syncope, or death. The follow-up period for these patients extended until August 31, 2023. Comorbidities in the study group that indicated the need for BB therapy included hypertension, significant arrhythmia, and coronary artery disease. In the Cox regression analysis, the association between BB use and the predefined endpoints was adjusted for age, baseline European Society of Cardiology risk score, and upfront therapy. Results Among the 806 patients, BBs were administered to 469 (58.2%) at the time of PAH diagnosis. In the entire cohort, BB therapy was linked to increased all-cause mortality (29.6% vs 21.4%; p=0.005, Fig 1.A) and a higher incidence of the composite endpoint (34.1% vs 22.6%; p<0.0001, Fig 1.B). The Number Needed to Harm (NNH) for BB treatment, regarding mortality and the composite endpoint, were 12.1 and 8.7, respectively. In patients without comorbidities, BB use significantly raised the risk of both all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.81, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.01-3.15) and the composite endpoint (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.09-3.14), after adjustments for age, baseline three-strata PAH mortality risk, and upfront therapy. However, in patients with at least one comorbidity, BB therapy showed a neutral effect on both outcomes. Across the whole group, the use of nonselective BB was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.13-2.82, p=0.01) compared to selective β1 agents, although this did not extend to all-cause mortality (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.79-2.25, p=0.28). Conclusion BBs, particularly nonselective, pose significant risks in patients with PAH who lack comorbidities that justify their use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2179
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of beta blockers on outcome in patients with PAH with and without comorbid conditions: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (BNP-PL)

Marcin Waligóra, Ilona Skoczylas, Grzegorz Kopeć, Ewa Lewicka et al.
European Heart Journal
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Effects of beta blockers on outcome in patients with PAH with and without comorbid conditions: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (BNP-PL)

Marcin Waligóra, Ilona Skoczylas, Grzegorz Kopeć, Ewa Lewicka, Grzegorz Grześk, Łukasz Chrzanowski, Katarzyna Mizia­‐Stec, Małgorzata Peregud‐Pogorzelska, Piotr Błaszczak, Marcin Kurzyna, Beata Kuśmierczyk, Tatiana Mularek‐Kubzdela, Anna Doboszyńska, Miłosz Jaguszewski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The current guidelines do not recommend the use of beta-blockers (BB) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) unless necessitated by comorbidities. However, the evidence regarding the role of BB in PAH is contradictory. This study investigates the effects of BB on clinical outcomes in patients newly diagnosed with PAH, stratified by the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities that justify their use. Methods We analyzed data from 806 patients newly diagnosed with PAH, who were prospectively enrolled from March 1, 2018, to August 31, 2023, in the multicentre registry, Database of Pulmonary Hypertension in the Polish population (BNP-PL). The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and a composite of hospitalization due to right heart exacerbation, syncope, or death. The follow-up period for these patients extended until August 31, 2023. Comorbidities in the study group that indicated the need for BB therapy included hypertension, significant arrhythmia, and coronary artery disease. In the Cox regression analysis, the association between BB use and the predefined endpoints was adjusted for age, baseline European Society of Cardiology risk score, and upfront therapy. Results Among the 806 patients, BBs were administered to 469 (58.2%) at the time of PAH diagnosis. In the entire cohort, BB therapy was linked to increased all-cause mortality (29.6% vs 21.4%; p=0.005, Fig 1.A) and a higher incidence of the composite endpoint (34.1% vs 22.6%; p<0.0001, Fig 1.B). The Number Needed to Harm (NNH) for BB treatment, regarding mortality and the composite endpoint, were 12.1 and 8.7, respectively. In patients without comorbidities, BB use significantly raised the risk of both all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.81, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.01-3.15) and the composite endpoint (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.09-3.14), after adjustments for age, baseline three-strata PAH mortality risk, and upfront therapy. However, in patients with at least one comorbidity, BB therapy showed a neutral effect on both outcomes. Across the whole group, the use of nonselective BB was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.13-2.82, p=0.01) compared to selective β1 agents, although this did not extend to all-cause mortality (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.79-2.25, p=0.28). Conclusion BBs, particularly nonselective, pose significant risks in patients with PAH who lack comorbidities that justify their use.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Medical University of Lublin (PL), Jagiellonian University (PL), Medical University of Białystok (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), Medical University of Lodz (PL), European Hospital (IT), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL), Gdańsk Medical University (PL), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.