A novel risk-stratification model that predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent pericarditis

Abstract Background Recurrent Pericarditis (RP) is condition associated with significant debility and morbidity. Previous studies have identified variables such as elevated C-Reactive protein, corticosteroid usage, and presence of delayed hyper-enhancement (DHE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are associated with recurrence. To date however, there is no established model for risk stratifying outcomes in these patients, therefore we attempted to develop a model that could predict long-term outcomes in patients with RP and stratify them into groups based on risk. Methods A total of 365 consecutive patients with RP from 2012-2019 were retrospectively examined. Our primary outcome was clinical remission (CR) defined as symptom resolution in addition to complete cessation of all anti-inflammatory therapy. We employed 5 survival models: CoxPH, RSF, SSVM, GBSA and XGBoost with Cox loss function to determine the likelihood of achieving CR within 5 years and to stratify patients into specific risk groups. We divided the dataset into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Model training and optimization of the training set occurred via 5-fold cross validation. Model evaluation and selection was based on C-index. Finally, we employed an explainable artificial intelligence approach, SHapley Additive exPlanations to generate both individual and global explanation of the models decision. Results Amongst the cohort, the mean age was 46 ± 15 years, 205 (56%) were female, and the main etiology was idiopathic in 223 (61%). CR was achieved in 118 (32%) patients. The final model included steroid dependency, total number of recurrences, pericardial DHE, age, etiology, gender, ejection fraction and heart rate as its most important parameters. We observed similar CR rates across three risk score ranges and accordingly stratified patients into low (n=62), intermediate (n=154), and high-risk (n=149) groups. Scores of 3 or lower were categorized as low risk, with CR rates exceeding 90%. Scores of 4 to 7 were associated with CR rates of 50%. Scores of 8 or higher were deemed high-risk, with CR rates notably below 10%. Overall, the model predicted the outcome with C-index of 0.800 on the test set and exhibited a significant ability in stratification of patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (log-rank test; P <0.0001). Conclusion We created a novel risk prediction model that can aid in predicting rates clinical remission in patients with recurrent pericarditis as well as aid in stratification into low, medium, and high risk groups. This risk prediction model may be helpful in diagnosis and management of these complicated patients.Figure 1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2098
Primary Topic
Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel risk-stratification model that predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent pericarditis

Ankit Agrawal, T K M Wang, Abdullah Yesilyaprak, Beni Verma et al.
European Heart Journal
Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
article

A novel risk-stratification model that predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent pericarditis

Ankit Agrawal, T K M Wang, Abdullah Yesilyaprak, Beni Verma, Paul C Cremer, Allan L. Klein, Alveena Batool Syed, Ashwin S. Kumar, Muhammad Majid, Danny Rayes, David Chen, Muhammad Furqan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recurrent Pericarditis (RP) is condition associated with significant debility and morbidity. Previous studies have identified variables such as elevated C-Reactive protein, corticosteroid usage, and presence of delayed hyper-enhancement (DHE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are associated with recurrence. To date however, there is no established model for risk stratifying outcomes in these patients, therefore we attempted to develop a model that could predict long-term outcomes in patients with RP and stratify them into groups based on risk. Methods A total of 365 consecutive patients with RP from 2012-2019 were retrospectively examined. Our primary outcome was clinical remission (CR) defined as symptom resolution in addition to complete cessation of all anti-inflammatory therapy. We employed 5 survival models: CoxPH, RSF, SSVM, GBSA and XGBoost with Cox loss function to determine the likelihood of achieving CR within 5 years and to stratify patients into specific risk groups. We divided the dataset into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Model training and optimization of the training set occurred via 5-fold cross validation. Model evaluation and selection was based on C-index. Finally, we employed an explainable artificial intelligence approach, SHapley Additive exPlanations to generate both individual and global explanation of the models decision. Results Amongst the cohort, the mean age was 46 ± 15 years, 205 (56%) were female, and the main etiology was idiopathic in 223 (61%). CR was achieved in 118 (32%) patients. The final model included steroid dependency, total number of recurrences, pericardial DHE, age, etiology, gender, ejection fraction and heart rate as its most important parameters. We observed similar CR rates across three risk score ranges and accordingly stratified patients into low (n=62), intermediate (n=154), and high-risk (n=149) groups. Scores of 3 or lower were categorized as low risk, with CR rates exceeding 90%. Scores of 4 to 7 were associated with CR rates of 50%. Scores of 8 or higher were deemed high-risk, with CR rates notably below 10%. Overall, the model predicted the outcome with C-index of 0.800 on the test set and exhibited a significant ability in stratification of patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (log-rank test; P <0.0001). Conclusion We created a novel risk prediction model that can aid in predicting rates clinical remission in patients with recurrent pericarditis as well as aid in stratification into low, medium, and high risk groups. This risk prediction model may be helpful in diagnosis and management of these complicated patients.Figure 1

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Georgetown University (US), Wayne State University (US), Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.