CCTA and CTP imaging for detecting clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background The evaluation of coronary artery stents via Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) can be compromised by artefacts, potentially undermining its diagnostic accuracy. The integration of CT Perfusion (CTP) with CCTA (CCTA+CTP) has been proposed to enhance the diagnostic yield in detecting in-stent restenosis (ISR). Purpose This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic performance of CCTA and combined CCTA+CTP in detecting ISR. Methods A comprehensive literature search of studies from 2005 to 2022 identified 13,747 articles. Inclusion criteria comprised the utilization of multidetector CT scanners with ≥64 slices and invasive coronary angiography as the reference standard. Studies that systematically evaluated stent patency in asymptomatic patients as part of their protocol were excluded. Results After removing duplicates, screening titles and abstracts, and conducting full-text reviews, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria (17 CCTA, 3 CCTA+CTP). Data on 2,674 CCTA-assessed stents and 752 CCTA+CTP-assessed stents were analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed that CCTA alone achieved a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI; 84-94%) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI; 86-92%)(Figure 1). CCTA+CTP exhibited comparable diagnostic performance, with a per-stent sensitivity of 88% (95% CI; 80-94%) and a specificity of 88% (95% CI; 84-93%) (Figure 2). The summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (sROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.96 (95% CI; 0.94-0.97) for CCTA and 0.96 (95% CI; 0.89-1.00) for CCTA+CTP, indicating a high overall performance for both diagnostic modalities. Conclusion Utilizing contemporary imaging hardware, both CCTA and CCTA+CTP demonstrate high diagnostic performance in evaluating ISR. The findings suggest that the presence of coronary artery stents should not preclude the use of these non-invasive diagnostic tests in clinical practice.Figure 1Figure 2