Real-life experience with rilonacept for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis

Abstract Background Rilonacept, a soluble Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor fusion protein that neutralizes IL-1α and IL-1β, has shown efficacy in symptom resolution, weaning of standard-of-care therapies, and reducing the frequency of recurrent pericarditis (RP) episodes in clinical trials. Purpose We aimed to review the efficacy, safety, and duration of treatment with Rilonacept reliance in managing RP in our practice. Methods We analyzed 22 patients with RP treated with Rilonacept, 55 [43-69] years, 11 (50%) females. We reviewed clinical characteristics and outcomes, including the time since initial diagnosis of pericarditis, the presence of pericardial effusion/thickening, the duration of Rilonacept treatment, the ability to wean off steroids, and the recurrence of pericarditis symptoms attempting discontinuation. Results The length of time from the initial diagnosis of pericarditis to Rilonacept initiation was 9 [4-32] months. Fifteen patients out of 22 (68%) had pericardial effusion, 3 (20%) with tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis. Median length of treatment with Rilonacept was 14 [6-23] months, with 17/22 (77%) of patients being treated for ≥ 6 months. All patients who were on steroids (14/22, 64%) were able to discontinue their usage 1 [1-9] months after starting Rilonacept. Of the seventeen who were treated for 6 months or more, 12 (70%) remained on Rilonacept 160 mg weekly at the most recent assessment, 3 (18%) continued treatment with Rilonacept 160 mg every 2 or 4 weeks, and 2 (12%) discontinued Rilonacept treatment after 6 and 50 months. Of the 12 patients who remained on weekly treatment after a period of 6 months, 8 (67%) required Rilonacept for symptom control, 1 (8%) had recurrent symptoms after treatment every 2 weeks, and the remaining 3 (25%) preferred to continue despite a lack of symptoms (Figure 1). Conclusions The efficacy of Rilonacept in treating patients with RP and the ability to stop steroid therapy in the real world is in line with the efficacy data from clinical trials.Figure 1