The efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism in patients with active malignant disease

Abstract Background Active malignant disease is associated with pulmonary embolism and the treatment of this condition is very challenging. The efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy for acute severe PE in patients with active malignant disease is unknown. Aim This study aimed to investigate hospital mortality rate and the incidence of major bleeding at 7 days according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria in patients with active malignant disease who were treated with thrombolytic therapy due to severe acute PE. Methods Patients with acute PE proven by computed tomography pulmonary angiography who were admitted to intensive care units have enrolled in the Regional PE Registry (REPER) since 2015, consisting of 10 hospitals from the 4 east Balkan countries. The decision to use thrombolytic therapy was at the discretion of the attending physicians, and it was used in high-risk, and intermediate-high-risk PE patients. Hospital mortality and the incidence of major bleeding at 7 days were compared between patients with active cancer and those without it who received thrombolytic therapy. Alteplase-based therapy was used. Results Among 2070 patients with acute PE enrolled in REPER, intermediate-high and high-risk PE had 795 patients without malignant disease and 135 had active malignant disease in the last 6 months. Patients with malignant disease had less chance to be treated with thrombolysis than patients without it (29.1% vs 44.7%, OR 0.508, 95%CI 0.341-0.756, p=0.001). For patients treated with thrombolysis, hospital mortality was non significantly higher in patients with the malignant disease compared to patients without it (25.6% vs 16,1%, OR 1.803, 95%CI 0.833-3.904, p=0.132), and the incidence of major bleeding at seven days was similar (15.4% vs 18.5%, OR 0.800, 95%CI 0.322-1.989, p=0.6131). There was no significant difference in age, sex, and PE risk distribution between patients with active malignant disease and those without it who were treated with thrombolysis. Conclusion Thrombolytic therapy seems to be underutilized in patients with the active malignant disease compared to patients without it in severe acute PE. In the selected patients who were treated with thrombolysis for severe acute PE, the efficacy and safety are similar between patients with and without active malignant disease.