Gender differences in coronary artery disease patterns

Abstract Background Gender differences in clinical presentation, natural history, and prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) have been reported. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has also been shown to yield higher values in women than men. However, the gender differences in CAD patterns (focal vs diffuse) defined by coronary physiology remain to be studied. Methods This prospective study was performed at 23 sites and enrolled patients with at least one epicardial lesion with an FFR ≤ 0.80 intended to be treated by PCI. All patients underwent a standardized physiological protocol that mandated FFR pullbacks with pullback pressure gradient (PPG) calculation. The aim was to compare CAD patterns, defined by PPG, between genders. Results Overall, 1004 patients were included in the analysis, 236 females (250 vessels) and 768 males (794 vessels). Women were older (69.8 ± 10.3 vs. 67.0 ± 10.1, p <0.001), less frequently smokers (9.7% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.002), had less prior PCI in a non-target vessel (19.1% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.001) and had less prior MIs (14.4% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.021). On the baseline seven-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), females reported more physical limitation (70.9 ± 29.5 vs. 80.9 ± 25.1, p < 0.001), more frequent angina (76.7 ± 22.9 vs. 81.5 ± 20.3, p = 0.002) and a lower quality of life (51.8 ± 29.4 vs. 57.8 ± 29.1, p = 0.006) than men for the same degree of flow reduction (FFR 0.69 ± 0.12 vs. 0.67 ± 0.11, p=0.098). In women, the pattern of CAD demonstrated a more focal nature compared to men (PPG 0.65 ± 0.16 vs. 0.61 ± 0.16, p = 0.001). Also, women achieved higher post-PCI FFR (0.88 ± 0.07 vs. 0.87 ± 0.07, p = 0.02). The rate of periprocedural MI was not statistically different between genders (5.1% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.79) Conclusion Among patients with hemodynamically significant CAD, women report more symptoms and lower quality of life. Despite sharing a similar degree of flow impairment, women exhibited a more focal CAD phenotype than men, leading to superior physiological outcomes after PCI.Study flowchartPRO and Phisiology by gender

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1401
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender differences in coronary artery disease patterns

Carlos Collet, Julien Adjedj, A. Yong, Sofie Brouwers et al.
European Heart Journal
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Gender differences in coronary artery disease patterns

Carlos Collet, Julien Adjedj, A. Yong, Sofie Brouwers, Kazuyoshi Sakai, Masafumi Nakayama, Bernard De Bruyne, Thomas Engstrøm, Tatyana Yevgenyevna Storozhenko, Colin Berry, Damien Collison, Daniel Munhoz, Javier Escaned, Liyew Desta, Ketina Arslani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Gender differences in clinical presentation, natural history, and prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) have been reported. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has also been shown to yield higher values in women than men. However, the gender differences in CAD patterns (focal vs diffuse) defined by coronary physiology remain to be studied. Methods This prospective study was performed at 23 sites and enrolled patients with at least one epicardial lesion with an FFR ≤ 0.80 intended to be treated by PCI. All patients underwent a standardized physiological protocol that mandated FFR pullbacks with pullback pressure gradient (PPG) calculation. The aim was to compare CAD patterns, defined by PPG, between genders. Results Overall, 1004 patients were included in the analysis, 236 females (250 vessels) and 768 males (794 vessels). Women were older (69.8 ± 10.3 vs. 67.0 ± 10.1, p <0.001), less frequently smokers (9.7% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.002), had less prior PCI in a non-target vessel (19.1% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.001) and had less prior MIs (14.4% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.021). On the baseline seven-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), females reported more physical limitation (70.9 ± 29.5 vs. 80.9 ± 25.1, p < 0.001), more frequent angina (76.7 ± 22.9 vs. 81.5 ± 20.3, p = 0.002) and a lower quality of life (51.8 ± 29.4 vs. 57.8 ± 29.1, p = 0.006) than men for the same degree of flow reduction (FFR 0.69 ± 0.12 vs. 0.67 ± 0.11, p=0.098). In women, the pattern of CAD demonstrated a more focal nature compared to men (PPG 0.65 ± 0.16 vs. 0.61 ± 0.16, p = 0.001). Also, women achieved higher post-PCI FFR (0.88 ± 0.07 vs. 0.87 ± 0.07, p = 0.02). The rate of periprocedural MI was not statistically different between genders (5.1% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.79) Conclusion Among patients with hemodynamically significant CAD, women report more symptoms and lower quality of life. Despite sharing a similar degree of flow impairment, women exhibited a more focal CAD phenotype than men, leading to superior physiological outcomes after PCI.Study flowchartPRO and Phisiology by gender

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU), Golden Jubilee National Hospital (GB), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE), Tower Semiconductor (Israel) (IL), Cardiovascular Research Center (BR)
Abbott Vascular
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.