Gender differences in coronary artery disease patterns
Abstract Background Gender differences in clinical presentation, natural history, and prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) have been reported. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has also been shown to yield higher values in women than men. However, the gender differences in CAD patterns (focal vs diffuse) defined by coronary physiology remain to be studied. Methods This prospective study was performed at 23 sites and enrolled patients with at least one epicardial lesion with an FFR ≤ 0.80 intended to be treated by PCI. All patients underwent a standardized physiological protocol that mandated FFR pullbacks with pullback pressure gradient (PPG) calculation. The aim was to compare CAD patterns, defined by PPG, between genders. Results Overall, 1004 patients were included in the analysis, 236 females (250 vessels) and 768 males (794 vessels). Women were older (69.8 ± 10.3 vs. 67.0 ± 10.1, p <0.001), less frequently smokers (9.7% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.002), had less prior PCI in a non-target vessel (19.1% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.001) and had less prior MIs (14.4% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.021). On the baseline seven-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), females reported more physical limitation (70.9 ± 29.5 vs. 80.9 ± 25.1, p < 0.001), more frequent angina (76.7 ± 22.9 vs. 81.5 ± 20.3, p = 0.002) and a lower quality of life (51.8 ± 29.4 vs. 57.8 ± 29.1, p = 0.006) than men for the same degree of flow reduction (FFR 0.69 ± 0.12 vs. 0.67 ± 0.11, p=0.098). In women, the pattern of CAD demonstrated a more focal nature compared to men (PPG 0.65 ± 0.16 vs. 0.61 ± 0.16, p = 0.001). Also, women achieved higher post-PCI FFR (0.88 ± 0.07 vs. 0.87 ± 0.07, p = 0.02). The rate of periprocedural MI was not statistically different between genders (5.1% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.79) Conclusion Among patients with hemodynamically significant CAD, women report more symptoms and lower quality of life. Despite sharing a similar degree of flow impairment, women exhibited a more focal CAD phenotype than men, leading to superior physiological outcomes after PCI.Study flowchartPRO and Phisiology by gender
Authors
- Carlos Collet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-0082)
- Julien Adjedj (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0902-8347)
- A. Yong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-4300)
- Sofie Brouwers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7081-4881)
- Kazuyoshi Sakai
- Masafumi Nakayama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-7522)
- Bernard De Bruyne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6567-168X)
- Thomas Engstrøm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5436-9194)
- Tatyana Yevgenyevna Storozhenko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9158-2012)
- Colin Berry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4547-8636)
- Damien Collison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-0872)
- Daniel Munhoz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-4504)
- Javier Escaned (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-0112)
- Liyew Desta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-4159)
- Ketina Arslani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0539-6417)
Institutions
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU)
- Golden Jubilee National Hospital (GB)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Rigshospitalet (DK)
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
- Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE)
- Tower Semiconductor (Israel) (IL)
- Cardiovascular Research Center (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Heart Journal
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1401
- Primary Topic
- Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Abbott Vascular