Concomitant cardiac arrest on cardiogenic shock patients. Differences in clinical profile and outcomes with non-cardiac arrest patients. The Shock CAT Study

Abstract Background Mortality on cardiogenic shock (CS) remains undesirable, although CS patients with or without concomitant CA may have different prognoses and clinical profile. Purpose The aim is to analyse differences in clinical profile, management, in-hospital prognosis and mid-term mortality in CS patients with and without cardiac arrest on admission in a Mediterranean cohort. Method Shock CAT study was a multicentre, prospective, observational study conducted between December 2018 and December 2019 in eight public University hospitals in Catalonia (Spain), including CS patients of different aetiologies. Data on clinical presentation, biomarkers, management, including mechanical cardiac/circulatory support (MCS), in-hospital and 6 months mortality were analysed comparing patients with and without CA at admission. Results A total of 382 CS patients (p) were included: CA 34.8% (n=133 p) and non-CA 65.2% (n=249 p). CA patients were younger than non-CA (61.9 vs 67.4 years, p<0.001) with higher prevalence of men (82% vs 71.8%, p= 0.024). Acute coronary syndrome was the main CS cause (60.7%) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was higher in CA patients than non-CA (55.6% vs 42.6%, p<0.001). In CA group, time to recover of spontaneous circulation was 24 min (IQR: 14-40 min) and hypothermia was performed in 55% of cases. CA patients had less prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia) and lower pH at admission (7.19 vs 7.31, p<0.001) and higher lactate peak (6.9 vs 5.0, p=0.001) than non-CA patients. MCS was implanted in 35.3% of all CS patients, with lower use in CA patients (23.3% vs 41.8%, p<0.001), mainly due to lower intraaortic balloon pump (19.5% vs 35.5%, p=0.001), without differences in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (11.4% vs 8.7%, p=0.40) or Impella (10.6% vs 12.8%. p=0.54). Cardshock score was higher in CA patients than non-CA (4.68 vs 4.2, p=0.038), without differences in IABP score (2.31 vs 2.20, p= 0.621) or SCAI D/E (42.1% vs 33.3%, p= 0.090). In-hospital mortality was higher in CA patients (42.9% vs 27.7%, p=0<0.001). Moreover, 6-months mortality remains higher in CA than non-CA patients, although without statistical significance (47.7% vs 38.3%, p=0.079). Conclusions In a Mediterranean CS cohort, concomitant CA patients were younger, with higher prevalence in men with STEMI. MCS had a lower used in CA patients, although without differences in ECMO or Impella. In-hospital mortality was 35% higher in CA patients than non-CA, although 6-months mortality only trend to be higher in CA group.