Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent revascularization in the treatment of de novo acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) revascularization on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with de novo acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background Data on DCB-only treatment in the context of AMI are limited. Methods A total of 96 patients with de novo AMI successfully treated with DCB alone were retrospectively enrolled. Visual residual stenosis ≤ 30% without flow-limiting dissection was considered a satisfactory pre-balloon angioplasty and followed by DCB treatment. We compared it with 96 propensity-matched patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) from the PTRG-DES registry (n = 13,160 patients). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprised cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent or target lesion thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type 3 or greater) at 1 year. Results Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The mean device diameter was larger in DES group (2.7 ± 0.3 mm vs. 3.1 ± 0.4 mm, P < 0.001). No abrupt vessel closure requiring treatment occurred after treatment with DCB. The MACE was comparable in both groups (6.2% in DCB group vs. 7.3% in DES group, P = 0.790) at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions In de novo AMI patients, DCB-only treatment approach had comparable clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up. DCB-only treatment may be a safe and effective alternative to DES in carefully selected patients who had satisfactory pre-dilation results.