Quantitative myocardial blood flow distribution derived from CCTA and determination of myocardium at risk in the FAST TRACK CABG trial

Abstract Background In the anatomic SYNTAX score derived from invasive coronary angiography, the ischemic impact of each stenotic coronary segment is weighed with a fixed score based on the severity of luminal diameter narrowing and the theoretical amount of blood flow supplied to the myocardium(1). This method neither accounts for individual variation nor reflects the true extent of myocardium ischemia. Purpose We aim to provide a quantitative CT SYNTAX score derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with customized percent blood flow distribution to the myocardium supplied by each stenotic coronary segment to determine the myocardium at risk of ischemia. Methods Patients with 3VD and/or left main coronary artery disease (CAD) were included in the first-in-human FAST TRACK CABG trial and received surgical revascularization guided solely by CCTA and fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFRCT). The recently reported anatomic CT-SYNTAX score was calculated for all cases. The FFRCT value and percent myocardial blood flow distribution(%MBF) were computed for all 16 SYNTAX score segments using the validated method of Keulards et al(2). On the pre-CABG CCTA, the segments located distal to the site where the FFRCT value dropped below 0.80 were considered at risk of ischemia, and the individual weight point per segment was calculated as 6×%MBF for each segment. The SYNTAX score derived from %MBF is compared to the anatomic and functional CT-SYNTAX score. Results Out of 114 patients enrolled, FFRCT and %MBF were analyzable in 106 patients. After excluding vessels with total occlusion, the coronary flow distribution between the right and left coronary systems was 20.5% vs 79.5%, respectively, similar to the 1:5 ratio in the anatomic SYNTAX score. The anatomic and functional CT-SYNTAX scores were 43.6 and 41.1, respectively. The average total %MBF per patient was 72.0(19.1)%, and the average SYNTAX score derived from %MBF was 38.0. There is a strong correlation between functional SYNTAX score and SYNTAX score derived from %MBF (Peason’s R=0.93). Passing-Bablock regression trends showed that the functional SYNTAX score slightly overestimated the SYNTAX score derived from %MBF (Figure 1). The coronary segment weight varied significantly per individual, especially in the presence of total occlusion. Overall, the fixed weight of the anatomic SYNTAX score is a good surrogate for the individualized weighing based on %MBF (Figure 2). Conclusion CCTA-derived %MBF enabled clinicians to quantify the individualized myocardium at risk of ischemia or injury in patients with severe CAD. Retrospectively, the fixed weight score used in the anatomical SYNTAX score appeared to be a robust surrogate for myocardial blood flow distribution.Figure 1Figure 2