Long-term clinical implications of routine follow-up coronary angiography of asymptomatic patients with long-duration diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention in drug-eluting stent e

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), significantly contributing to mortality in affected patients. There are concerns about the adequacy of clinical follow-up for post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) surveillance, especially in uncontrolled DM, due to potential asymptomatic CAD. This study assesses whether routine follow-up coronary angiography (FUCAG) offers a surveillance advantage over clinical follow-up in uncontrolled DM post-PCI. Methods From 2014 to 2020, a study was conducted on patients with DM who underwent PCI at our university medical. Poorly controlled DM was defined as a mean HbA1c of 9 or higher during the index PCI and follow-up period. Out of a total of 2,864 individuals, after excluding 538 individuals with a follow-up period of less than 4 years and 232 individuals who experienced an event within a year, a total of 2,094 was enrolled. Follow-up coronary angiography (FUCAG) was defined as angiography performed between 6- and 18-months post-index PCI for lesion evaluation. To adjust for any differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented. The primary outcome was defined as Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), comprising all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization. Results PSM was conducted to correct the difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no difference between FUCAG and clinical follow-up for MACE (Log-rank: P=0.770). Cox proportional regression analysis revealed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.70-1.63, indicating no statistically significant difference. Conclusions Even in poorly controlled DM patients, there was no apparent clinical benefit of FUCAG compared to clinical follow-up. Particularly considering concerns such as renal function deterioration in DM patients, post-PCI surveillance through clinical follow-up may be advantageous.