Impact of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella

Abstract Background Mortality rates remain high in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) combined with Impella (ECPELLA) support. Early weaning from VA-ECMO may be the first step in reducing mortality in these patients. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy improves right ventricular function by decreasing pulmonary arterial resistance, resulting in increased Impella flow rate, which may facilitate early withdrawal of VA-ECMO and improve survival. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of iNO therapy on ECPELLA patients. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with CS due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with ECPELLA from September 2019 to January 2024 at our hospital. The VA-ECMO withdrawal rate, time to withdrawal, and 30-day survival were compared for ECPELLA patients with and without iNO therapy. Results A total of 47 patients were included (AMI-CS, n=26, and ADHF-CS, n=21). Of these, 21 patients (44.7%) were treated with iNO therapy. Patient characteristics were not significantly different between those with and without iNO therapy, including age, gender, percentage of cardiopulmonary arrest or acute coronary syndrome, and lactate levels at mechanical circulatory support induction. Patients receiving iNO therapy had significantly higher VA-ECMO withdrawal rates (90% vs. 50%, P=0.003) and shorter time to VA-ECMO withdrawal (5.0±1.3 vs. 7.8±5.6 days, P=0.04) than those not receiving iNO therapy. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in patients receiving iNO therapy than those without (P=0.003, Figure). Conclusion Adjuvant iNO therapy for CS patients supported by ECPELLA facilitates early withdrawal of VA-ECMO and improve survival representing a useful therapeutic option.Figure

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1695
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella

Kazuyoshi Kakehi, Kosuke Fujita, Gaku Nakazawa, Masafumi Ueno et al.
European Heart Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Impact of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella

Kazuyoshi Kakehi, Kosuke Fujita, Gaku Nakazawa, Masafumi Ueno, N Yamada
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Mortality rates remain high in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) combined with Impella (ECPELLA) support. Early weaning from VA-ECMO may be the first step in reducing mortality in these patients. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy improves right ventricular function by decreasing pulmonary arterial resistance, resulting in increased Impella flow rate, which may facilitate early withdrawal of VA-ECMO and improve survival. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of iNO therapy on ECPELLA patients. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with CS due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with ECPELLA from September 2019 to January 2024 at our hospital. The VA-ECMO withdrawal rate, time to withdrawal, and 30-day survival were compared for ECPELLA patients with and without iNO therapy. Results A total of 47 patients were included (AMI-CS, n=26, and ADHF-CS, n=21). Of these, 21 patients (44.7%) were treated with iNO therapy. Patient characteristics were not significantly different between those with and without iNO therapy, including age, gender, percentage of cardiopulmonary arrest or acute coronary syndrome, and lactate levels at mechanical circulatory support induction. Patients receiving iNO therapy had significantly higher VA-ECMO withdrawal rates (90% vs. 50%, P=0.003) and shorter time to VA-ECMO withdrawal (5.0±1.3 vs. 7.8±5.6 days, P=0.04) than those not receiving iNO therapy. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in patients receiving iNO therapy than those without (P=0.003, Figure). Conclusion Adjuvant iNO therapy for CS patients supported by ECPELLA facilitates early withdrawal of VA-ECMO and improve survival representing a useful therapeutic option.Figure

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Kindai University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.