Incidence of MINOCA in the high-sensitivity troponin era: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background and Aim Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is often under-recognised in clinical practice. The reported incidence of MINOCA was estimated to be 6% of MI presentations by Pasupathy et al. in the era preceding adoption of high sensitivity troponin assays. We sought to investigate the incidence of MINOCA in the high-sensitivity troponin era as compared to incidence of MINOCA during the era of traditional cardiac biomarkers (standard troponin assays, CK, CK-MB). Methods A prospective systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE and EMBASE to capture relevant papers from 1996-2022 was performed. Papers detailing incidence of MI-CAD and MINOCA as well as the utilised biomarkers were included. Patient demographics, presentation and recorded biomarkers were also analysed for pre-specified analysis. Results 47 studies detailing the results of 667 850 patients were included. 53 586 patients were identified to have MINOCA with a mean weight incidence of 9.1% (7.3-11.3, 95% CI). MI-CAD patients were more likely to be male (68.5% vs 39.3%, RR (0.59, 0.74)) and had higher incidence of traditional cardiac risk factors. Notably chronic kidney disease was not associated with higher incidence of MICAD over MINOCA (RR 0.72, 0.5-1.03). There were no significant trends in incidence of MINOCA according to median year of study recruitment (ß=-0.18, (-0.76, 0.4) p=0.537). MINOCA patients were more likely to present as NSTEMI (14.5% (11.3-18.3, 95%CI)) rather than STEMI (3.5% (2.7-4.7%)). MINOCA patients had lower cardiac biomarker elevations than patients with MICAD. Conclusions The incidence of MINOCA higher than previously estimated in the era of high sensitivity troponin. MINOCA patients are less likely to have traditional cardiac risk factors and more likely to present with NSTEMI and smaller cardiac biomarker elevations than patients with MI-CAD.MINOCA RateMINOCA vs MI-CAD Risk Factors

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1711
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence of MINOCA in the high-sensitivity troponin era: a meta-analysis

J Beltrame, William Meere, Ian Rowe, Philopatir Mikhail et al.
European Heart Journal
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Incidence of MINOCA in the high-sensitivity troponin era: a meta-analysis

J Beltrame, William Meere, Ian Rowe, Philopatir Mikhail, Prajith Jeyaprakash, Thomas J. Ford, N. Howden, Susan Jaensch, A. Bland
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aim Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is often under-recognised in clinical practice. The reported incidence of MINOCA was estimated to be 6% of MI presentations by Pasupathy et al. in the era preceding adoption of high sensitivity troponin assays. We sought to investigate the incidence of MINOCA in the high-sensitivity troponin era as compared to incidence of MINOCA during the era of traditional cardiac biomarkers (standard troponin assays, CK, CK-MB). Methods A prospective systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE and EMBASE to capture relevant papers from 1996-2022 was performed. Papers detailing incidence of MI-CAD and MINOCA as well as the utilised biomarkers were included. Patient demographics, presentation and recorded biomarkers were also analysed for pre-specified analysis. Results 47 studies detailing the results of 667 850 patients were included. 53 586 patients were identified to have MINOCA with a mean weight incidence of 9.1% (7.3-11.3, 95% CI). MI-CAD patients were more likely to be male (68.5% vs 39.3%, RR (0.59, 0.74)) and had higher incidence of traditional cardiac risk factors. Notably chronic kidney disease was not associated with higher incidence of MICAD over MINOCA (RR 0.72, 0.5-1.03). There were no significant trends in incidence of MINOCA according to median year of study recruitment (ß=-0.18, (-0.76, 0.4) p=0.537). MINOCA patients were more likely to present as NSTEMI (14.5% (11.3-18.3, 95%CI)) rather than STEMI (3.5% (2.7-4.7%)). MINOCA patients had lower cardiac biomarker elevations than patients with MICAD. Conclusions The incidence of MINOCA higher than previously estimated in the era of high sensitivity troponin. MINOCA patients are less likely to have traditional cardiac risk factors and more likely to present with NSTEMI and smaller cardiac biomarker elevations than patients with MI-CAD.MINOCA RateMINOCA vs MI-CAD Risk Factors

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Gosford Hospital (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.