Impact of the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) on PCI planning and decision-making

Abstract Background Coronary physiology using a distal measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) informs about the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and, when used for clinical decision-making about revascularisation, is associated with improved outcomes in patients considered for PCI. A second dimension of coronary physiology is available by performing a pullback maneuver, which aids in assessing the presence and location of focal pressure gradients. Yet, the impact of intracoronary physiology guidance with FFR pullbacks on real-time physician decision-making during PCI is not fully known. Methods This prospective study was performed at 25 sites and enrolled patients with at least one epicardial lesion with FFR ≤ 0.80 planned to be treated by PCI. A standardized physiological assessment with FFR pullbacks and Pullback Pressure Gradient (PPG) calculation was performed. Treatment plans were recorded for each lesion based on angiography alone and following FFR pullbacks. The goal of this study was to assess the procedural impact of physiology guidance in stable patients scheduled for PCI. Results Overall, 993 patients (1044 vessels) underwent complete physiological assessment with FFR and PPG. Decision-making during PCI changed in 47.5% (443/1044) after FFR pullbacks. Decision-making during PCI changed in 32.4% (289/890) after FFR pullbacks. PPG use changed revascularisation decisions in 13.9% (138/993) from PCI to CABG (5%; 50/993), from PCI to CABG in 5% (50/993) and to medical management in 8.9% ( 88/993). The frequency of decision changes was significantly higher in patients with diffuse CAD compared to focal cases (24.8% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.001). Among the subset of 855 patients (involving 880 vessels) who underwent PCI, operators modified decision-making regarding stent length in 22.1% of cases (197 out of 880), with these alterations being more prevalent in patients with diffuse CAD (57.2% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.002). Suboptimal Post-PCI result (FFR < 0.88) was more frequent in cases in which PCI strategy was not adapted based on PPG (55.5% vs. 45.6%, p= 0.016) Importantly, there was no significant change in the overall number of stents per patient after FFR pullbacks. Conclusion A standardized coronary physiological assessment impacted PCI decision-making in one-third of the vessels, with a predominant effect in vessels diffusely diseased. The assessment of the distribution of pressure losses along the coronaries modifies the treatment decision and influences PCI strategy in a significant proportion of patients. These findings provide insights into mechanisms by which coronary physiology might improve PCI outcomes.PCI strategy change based on PPGCumulative change of PCI strategy