Remote ischemic peri-conditioning suppressed cardiac sympathetic nerve activity especially in the non-culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Background Remote ischemic periconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated cardioprotective effects and improved clinical outcomes as an adjunct to emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, it remains to be elucidated whether RIPC affects the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with AMI. Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of RIPC on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) in the culprit and non-culprit lesion respectively in patients with AMI. Methods We randomly assigned 157 patients with suspected AMI undergoing emergent PCI to receive transient limb ischemia (by inflating a cuff at 200 mmHg for 4×5 minutes: RIPC group, n=77) or no procedure (control group, n=80). After excluding inappropriate patients such as those with other diagnosis than AMI, we analyzed 122 patients (62 patients in RIPC and 60 in control group). CSNA was assessed in the culprit and non-culprit lesion respectively by the cardiac MIBG SPECT imaging. Results Patients in RIPC and control group had similar demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. Patients in RIPC group tended to show higher late uptake only in the non-culprit lesion at discharge. At 1 year after discharge, patients in RIPC group demonstrated significantly higher late uptake (p=0.021) and lower washout rate (p=0.013) than those in control group in the non-culprit lesion. Regarding the culprit lesion, only washout rate tended to be lower in RIPC group at 1 year after discharge. Conclusion(s): Remote ischemic peri-conditioning showed suppressive effect on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity especially in the non-culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction.SPECT parameters in RIPC and control

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1665
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote ischemic peri-conditioning suppressed cardiac sympathetic nerve activity especially in the non-culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Masatake Fukunami, Masanao Taniichi, Tetsuya Watanabe, Tsutomu Kawai et al.
1 citations
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
0.40
article

Remote ischemic peri-conditioning suppressed cardiac sympathetic nerve activity especially in the non-culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Masatake Fukunami, Masanao Taniichi, Tetsuya Watanabe, Tsutomu Kawai, Yuji Nishimoto, Masahiro Seo, Takeshi Fujita, Masato Kawasaki, Jun Nakamura, Takumi Kondo, Y. Chang, Terumasa Morita, A Kikuchi, T Yamada
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Remote ischemic periconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated cardioprotective effects and improved clinical outcomes as an adjunct to emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, it remains to be elucidated whether RIPC affects the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with AMI. Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of RIPC on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) in the culprit and non-culprit lesion respectively in patients with AMI. Methods We randomly assigned 157 patients with suspected AMI undergoing emergent PCI to receive transient limb ischemia (by inflating a cuff at 200 mmHg for 4×5 minutes: RIPC group, n=77) or no procedure (control group, n=80). After excluding inappropriate patients such as those with other diagnosis than AMI, we analyzed 122 patients (62 patients in RIPC and 60 in control group). CSNA was assessed in the culprit and non-culprit lesion respectively by the cardiac MIBG SPECT imaging. Results Patients in RIPC and control group had similar demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. Patients in RIPC group tended to show higher late uptake only in the non-culprit lesion at discharge. At 1 year after discharge, patients in RIPC group demonstrated significantly higher late uptake (p=0.021) and lower washout rate (p=0.013) than those in control group in the non-culprit lesion. Regarding the culprit lesion, only washout rate tended to be lower in RIPC group at 1 year after discharge. Conclusion(s): Remote ischemic peri-conditioning showed suppressive effect on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity especially in the non-culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction.SPECT parameters in RIPC and control

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Osaka Prefectural Medical Center (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.