Improving prehospital risk stratification using deep learning ECG interpretation in suspected acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Introduction Most patients presenting with chest pain in the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) setting are suspected of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Distinguishing true NSTE-ACS from non-cardiac chest pain based solely on the electrocardiogram (ECG) is challenging. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) models for ECG interpretation show promising results. Purpose The aim of this study is to develop and validate a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based model to diagnose NSTE-ACS within the prehospital ECG and to compare it to current prehospital available diagnostic tools. Methods For this study, a training/internal validation cohort (n= 4891) and external validation cohort (n= 754) were used, both consisting of suspected NSTE-ACS patients, and the first prehospital standard 12-lead ECG at presentation was extracted. A CNN (ECG-AI) was trained and validated to detect NSTE-ACS. The training/internal validation cohort was extracted from suspected NSTE-ACS patients presenting to the emergency department. The external validation cohort was extracted from a prehospital, prospective cohort study in which subjects were assessed by EMS paramedics. A validated prehospital clinical risk score (preHEART) was calculated, which includes manual on-site ECG analyses by EMS paramedic (ECG-EMS) and a point-of-care (POC) troponin assessment, and compared to ECG-AI in diagnosing NSTE-ACS. Results In the external validation cohort, 202 (27%) subjects were diagnosed with NSTE-ACS. ECG-AI had a better diagnostic performance than ECG-EMS (AUC 0.70 (0.66–0.74) vs. AUC 0.65 (0.61–0.70), p=0.045) for diagnosing NSTE-ACS. The overall diagnostic accuracy of preHEART was AUC 0.78 (0.74–0.82) and superior compared to ECG-AI (p= 0.001). Incorporating ECG-AI instead of ECG-EMS into preHEART led to a significant improvement in diagnostic performance (AUC 0.83 (0.79–0.86,p < 0.001)). Conclusion Integrating AI in prehospital ECG interpretation improves NSTE-ACS diagnosis. However, clinical risk scores still yield the best diagnostic performance in the prehospital setting and their accuracy could be further enhanced through AI.ROC prehospital diagnostic toolsROC preheart and preheart-AI

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1722
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving prehospital risk stratification using deep learning ECG interpretation in suspected acute coronary syndrome

Pim A.L. Tonino, Jesse P. A. Demandt, Maaike Bastiaansen, Thomas P. Mast et al.
European Heart Journal
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Improving prehospital risk stratification using deep learning ECG interpretation in suspected acute coronary syndrome

Pim A.L. Tonino, Jesse P. A. Demandt, Maaike Bastiaansen, Thomas P. Mast, Konrad A.J. van Beek, Arjan Koks, Pieter J. J. Vlaar, Marcel van ’t Veer, F. M. Zimmermann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Most patients presenting with chest pain in the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) setting are suspected of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Distinguishing true NSTE-ACS from non-cardiac chest pain based solely on the electrocardiogram (ECG) is challenging. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) models for ECG interpretation show promising results. Purpose The aim of this study is to develop and validate a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based model to diagnose NSTE-ACS within the prehospital ECG and to compare it to current prehospital available diagnostic tools. Methods For this study, a training/internal validation cohort (n= 4891) and external validation cohort (n= 754) were used, both consisting of suspected NSTE-ACS patients, and the first prehospital standard 12-lead ECG at presentation was extracted. A CNN (ECG-AI) was trained and validated to detect NSTE-ACS. The training/internal validation cohort was extracted from suspected NSTE-ACS patients presenting to the emergency department. The external validation cohort was extracted from a prehospital, prospective cohort study in which subjects were assessed by EMS paramedics. A validated prehospital clinical risk score (preHEART) was calculated, which includes manual on-site ECG analyses by EMS paramedic (ECG-EMS) and a point-of-care (POC) troponin assessment, and compared to ECG-AI in diagnosing NSTE-ACS. Results In the external validation cohort, 202 (27%) subjects were diagnosed with NSTE-ACS. ECG-AI had a better diagnostic performance than ECG-EMS (AUC 0.70 (0.66–0.74) vs. AUC 0.65 (0.61–0.70), p=0.045) for diagnosing NSTE-ACS. The overall diagnostic accuracy of preHEART was AUC 0.78 (0.74–0.82) and superior compared to ECG-AI (p= 0.001). Incorporating ECG-AI instead of ECG-EMS into preHEART led to a significant improvement in diagnostic performance (AUC 0.83 (0.79–0.86,p < 0.001)). Conclusion Integrating AI in prehospital ECG interpretation improves NSTE-ACS diagnosis. However, clinical risk scores still yield the best diagnostic performance in the prehospital setting and their accuracy could be further enhanced through AI.ROC prehospital diagnostic toolsROC preheart and preheart-AI

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.