Being blind (or not) to scenarios used in sacrificial dilemmas: the influence of factual and contextual information on moral responses

These findings underscore the value of carefully considering the role of factual and contextual information provided by the scenarios in moral dilemmas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1477825
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Being blind (or not) to scenarios used in sacrificial dilemmas: the influence of factual and contextual information on moral responses

Robin Carron, Royce Anders, Emmanuelle Brigaud, Nathalie Blanc
2 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.69
article

Being blind (or not) to scenarios used in sacrificial dilemmas: the influence of factual and contextual information on moral responses

Robin Carron, Royce Anders, Emmanuelle Brigaud, Nathalie Blanc
article en
2 citations

Abstract

These findings underscore the value of carefully considering the role of factual and contextual information provided by the scenarios in moral dilemmas.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15
Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.