Clinical Diagnostic Value and Accuracy of Microbiological Testing for Pulmonary Aspergillosis Infection

Objective: To analyze the clinical diagnostic value and accuracy of microbiological testing for pulmonary aspergillosis infection.Methods: Sixty patients suspected of having pulmonary aspergillosis infection from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected. All selected patients underwent sputum culture test, galactomannan test (GM test), and 1,3-β-D-glucose (BDG) test (referred to as G test). Pathological histology examination was used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic value and accuracy of sputum culture test, GM test, and G test in pulmonary aspergillosis infection. Results: In this study, histopathological examination of 60 patients showed 35 positive cases and 25 negative cases of pulmonary aspergillosis infection. The sputum culture test results showed that there were 34 positive cases, 26 negative cases, 7 false positives, and 6 false negatives of pulmonary aspergillosis infection. The GM test results showed that there were 34 positive cases, 26 negative cases, 3 false positives, and 2 false negatives of pulmonary aspergillosis infection. The G test results showed that there were 34 positive cases, 26 negative cases, 8 false positives, and 7 false negatives of pulmonary aspergillosis infection. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the GM test were significantly higher than those of the sputum culture test and G test (P<0.05). Conclusion: The diagnostic value of the GM test in pulmonary aspergillosis infection is higher than the sputum culture test and G test, and it can be widely used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32629/jcmr.v5i3.2644
Primary Topic
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Diagnostic Value and Accuracy of Microbiological Testing for Pulmonary Aspergillosis Infection

Yuanxi Li
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
article

Clinical Diagnostic Value and Accuracy of Microbiological Testing for Pulmonary Aspergillosis Infection

Yuanxi Li
article en

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical diagnostic value and accuracy of microbiological testing for pulmonary aspergillosis infection.Methods: Sixty patients suspected of having pulmonary aspergillosis infection from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected. All selected patients underwent sputum culture test, galactomannan test (GM test), and 1,3-β-D-glucose (BDG) test (referred to as G test). Pathological histology examination was used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic value and accuracy of sputum culture test, GM test, and G test in pulmonary aspergillosis infection. Results: In this study, histopathological examination of 60 patients showed 35 positive cases and 25 negative cases of pulmonary aspergillosis infection. The sputum culture test results showed that there were 34 positive cases, 26 negative cases, 7 false positives, and 6 false negatives of pulmonary aspergillosis infection. The GM test results showed that there were 34 positive cases, 26 negative cases, 3 false positives, and 2 false negatives of pulmonary aspergillosis infection. The G test results showed that there were 34 positive cases, 26 negative cases, 8 false positives, and 7 false negatives of pulmonary aspergillosis infection. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the GM test were significantly higher than those of the sputum culture test and G test (P<0.05). Conclusion: The diagnostic value of the GM test in pulmonary aspergillosis infection is higher than the sputum culture test and G test, and it can be widely used.

Journal of Clinical Medicine ResearchVol. 5(3)
Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.