Prehospital point of care ultrasound in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: a 5-year experience study in Belgium

Introduction The utilization of Clinical Ultrasound (CUS) in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has become increasingly prevalent, reflecting its significant role in emergency care. Methods This descriptive, monocentric study, conducted at the Helicopter Medical Center (CMH) of Bra-sur-Lienne, Belgium, aimed to describe the use of CUS within HEMS and evaluate its potential impact on diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic interventions, and hospital destination decisions. Results Over a 5-year period, from January 2018 to December 2022, our retrospective analysis included 6,126 HEMS interventions, with CUS performed in 29.55% of cases. The study demonstrated that CUS led to therapeutic changes in 30.88% of instances and affected the hospital destination in 9% of cases, despite a potential bias toward directing patients to the University Hospital Center of Liège (CHU of Liège) due to operational constraints. The agreement between prehospital CUS findings and hospital imaging was substantial, with an 80.39% concordance rate, underscoring CUS's utility in enhancing prehospital diagnostic accuracy. We found no significant increase in on-scene time due to CUS usage, with most exams completed in <5 min. Discussion Our findings highlight the interesting role of CUS in HEMS, facilitating more informed and confident medical decision-making in prehospital emergency care. However, variability in CUS application emphasize the need for standardized guidelines to optimize its use. The study's limitations include its retrospective, monocentric design and the focus on on-scene ultrasound evaluations. Future research should aim at a more extensive, prospective analysis to further validate the benefits of CUS in emergency medical services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/femer.2024.1440545
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prehospital point of care ultrasound in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: a 5-year experience study in Belgium

Romain Betz, Méryl Paquay, Olivier Pirotte, Laurent Marissiaux et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
1.27
article

Prehospital point of care ultrasound in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: a 5-year experience study in Belgium

Romain Betz, Méryl Paquay, Olivier Pirotte, Laurent Marissiaux, Samuel Stipulante, Allison Gilbert, Didier Moens, Alexandre Ghuysen, Raphaëlle Lopez Iglesias
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction The utilization of Clinical Ultrasound (CUS) in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has become increasingly prevalent, reflecting its significant role in emergency care. Methods This descriptive, monocentric study, conducted at the Helicopter Medical Center (CMH) of Bra-sur-Lienne, Belgium, aimed to describe the use of CUS within HEMS and evaluate its potential impact on diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic interventions, and hospital destination decisions. Results Over a 5-year period, from January 2018 to December 2022, our retrospective analysis included 6,126 HEMS interventions, with CUS performed in 29.55% of cases. The study demonstrated that CUS led to therapeutic changes in 30.88% of instances and affected the hospital destination in 9% of cases, despite a potential bias toward directing patients to the University Hospital Center of Liège (CHU of Liège) due to operational constraints. The agreement between prehospital CUS findings and hospital imaging was substantial, with an 80.39% concordance rate, underscoring CUS's utility in enhancing prehospital diagnostic accuracy. We found no significant increase in on-scene time due to CUS usage, with most exams completed in <5 min. Discussion Our findings highlight the interesting role of CUS in HEMS, facilitating more informed and confident medical decision-making in prehospital emergency care. However, variability in CUS application emphasize the need for standardized guidelines to optimize its use. The study's limitations include its retrospective, monocentric design and the focus on on-scene ultrasound evaluations. Future research should aim at a more extensive, prospective analysis to further validate the benefits of CUS in emergency medical services.

Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency MedicineVol. 2
University of Liège (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
1.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.