Lockdown and Unrest: Inequality, Restrictions and Protests During COVID-19

This paper analyses how pre-pandemic levels of inequality across US counties have shaped the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of protests. The results from difference-in-differences and instrumental variable models using high-frequency weekly data show that more stringent measures to contain the pandemic increased the incidence of protests, but only in US counties with high levels of inequality before the start of the pandemic where grievances may have been initially stronger. The impact of government responses to COVID-19 on protests is largely explained by adverse changes in economic conditions in counties with the highest levels of pre-pandemic inequality. Policy stringency measures were also associated with more protests in the most unequal counties which voted for the Republican party in the 2016 elections and exhibited, at the start of the pandemic, lower levels of trust in the president and lower satisfaction with democracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027241296045
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lockdown and Unrest: Inequality, Restrictions and Protests During COVID-19

Bruno Martorano, Francesco Iacoella, Patrícia Justino
5 citations
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Employment and Welfare Studies
4.25
article

Lockdown and Unrest: Inequality, Restrictions and Protests During COVID-19

Bruno Martorano, Francesco Iacoella, Patrícia Justino
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper analyses how pre-pandemic levels of inequality across US counties have shaped the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of protests. The results from difference-in-differences and instrumental variable models using high-frequency weekly data show that more stringent measures to contain the pandemic increased the incidence of protests, but only in US counties with high levels of inequality before the start of the pandemic where grievances may have been initially stronger. The impact of government responses to COVID-19 on protests is largely explained by adverse changes in economic conditions in counties with the highest levels of pre-pandemic inequality. Policy stringency measures were also associated with more protests in the most unequal counties which voted for the Republican party in the 2016 elections and exhibited, at the start of the pandemic, lower levels of trust in the president and lower satisfaction with democracy.

Journal of Conflict ResolutionVol. 69(7-8)
United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL), United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (FI), Maastricht University (NL)
United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Employment and Welfare Studies
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.