Leveraging digital tools to enhance diversity and inclusion in clinical trial recruitment

Clinical research is pivotal in assessing the safety and efficacy of new treatments in healthcare. However, the success of such research depends on the inclusion of a diverse and representative participant sample, which is currently lacking. This lack of diversity in biomedical research participants has significant repercussions, limiting the real-world applicability and accessibility of medical interventions, especially for underrepresented groups. Barriers to diverse participation include historical mistrust, logistical challenges, and financial constraints. Recent guidelines by government agencies and funding bodies emphasize the need for diversity in clinical trials, but specific strategies for inclusive recruitment are often lacking. This paper explores the use of digital methods to enhance diversity and inclusion in research recruitment. Digital tools, such as electronic medical records, social media, research registries, and mobile applications, offer promising opportunities for reaching diverse populations. Strategies include culturally tailored messaging, collaborations with community organizations, and the use of SEO to improve visibility and engagement. However, challenges such as privacy concerns, digital literacy gaps, and ethical considerations must be addressed. The promotion of diversity in clinical research recruitment is crucial for advancing health equity. By leveraging digital tools and adopting inclusive strategies, study teams can improve the diversity of study participants, ultimately leading to more applicable and equitable healthcare outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1483367
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging digital tools to enhance diversity and inclusion in clinical trial recruitment

Samuel Byiringiro, Timothy B. Plante, Oluwabunmi Ogungbe, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb et al.
16 citations
Frontiers in Public Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
8.69
article

Leveraging digital tools to enhance diversity and inclusion in clinical trial recruitment

Samuel Byiringiro, Timothy B. Plante, Oluwabunmi Ogungbe, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Tosin Tomiwa, Hailey Miller, Esther Wong
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Clinical research is pivotal in assessing the safety and efficacy of new treatments in healthcare. However, the success of such research depends on the inclusion of a diverse and representative participant sample, which is currently lacking. This lack of diversity in biomedical research participants has significant repercussions, limiting the real-world applicability and accessibility of medical interventions, especially for underrepresented groups. Barriers to diverse participation include historical mistrust, logistical challenges, and financial constraints. Recent guidelines by government agencies and funding bodies emphasize the need for diversity in clinical trials, but specific strategies for inclusive recruitment are often lacking. This paper explores the use of digital methods to enhance diversity and inclusion in research recruitment. Digital tools, such as electronic medical records, social media, research registries, and mobile applications, offer promising opportunities for reaching diverse populations. Strategies include culturally tailored messaging, collaborations with community organizations, and the use of SEO to improve visibility and engagement. However, challenges such as privacy concerns, digital literacy gaps, and ethical considerations must be addressed. The promotion of diversity in clinical research recruitment is crucial for advancing health equity. By leveraging digital tools and adopting inclusive strategies, study teams can improve the diversity of study participants, ultimately leading to more applicable and equitable healthcare outcomes.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 12
University of Vermont (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
American Heart Association, Johns Hopkins University, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics in Clinical Research
8.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.