Identifying prognostic factors in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO treatment: insights from ECLS-SHOCK using machine learning

Abstract Background/Introduction Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has not been shown to reduce short-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. However, whether some patients might benefit from VA-ECMO remains to be cleared. Purpose To identify the impact of VA-ECMO therapy on outcomes by leveraging the potential of machine learning. Methods The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a randomized controlled trial where patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock for whom early revascularization was planned were randomly assigned to receive early VA-ECMO plus usual medical treatment or usual medical treatment alone. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 30 days. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was used to develop a model for the prediction of 30-day all-cause mortality and to assess the influence of VA-ECMO on outcomes. Results Overall, 209 patients were randomized to the VA-ECMO and 208 to control. Baseline characteristics between groups were well balanced (median age 63 years, 81% male, 67% presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). At 30-days 100 patients in the VA-ECMO and 102 in the control group were dead. The final XGBoost model contained 27 variables and the 10 most influential variables are shown in Fig. 1. On derivation the model predicted mortality with an AUC of 1.00 and on validation with an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.89), with a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 88% to 100%) and a specificity of 55% (40% to 69%), resulting in a positive predictive value of 65% and a negative predictive value of 92% at a Youden-derived cut-off. Importantly, neither the VA-ECMO therapy nor its complications were among the most influential factors of the model with a relative importance of 1.1% for VA-ECMO therapy and 0.25% for peripheral vascular complications and bleeding complications even being discarded by the model. Conclusion In patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the influence of VA-ECMO therapy on 30-day mortality, even when investigated with complex machine learning models, is negligibly low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1246
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying prognostic factors in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO treatment: insights from ECLS-SHOCK using machine learning

Carsten Skurk, Anne Freund, S Schneider, Hölger Thiele et al.
1 citations
European Heart Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
article

Identifying prognostic factors in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO treatment: insights from ECLS-SHOCK using machine learning

Carsten Skurk, Anne Freund, S Schneider, Hölger Thiele, Karl‐Patrik Kresoja, Tienush Rassaf, Amir Abbas Mahabadi, Ralf Lehmann, İbrahim Akın, Ingo Eitel, Tobias Graf, Andreas Schuster, Philipp Lurz, Steffen Desch, U Zweymer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has not been shown to reduce short-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. However, whether some patients might benefit from VA-ECMO remains to be cleared. Purpose To identify the impact of VA-ECMO therapy on outcomes by leveraging the potential of machine learning. Methods The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a randomized controlled trial where patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock for whom early revascularization was planned were randomly assigned to receive early VA-ECMO plus usual medical treatment or usual medical treatment alone. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 30 days. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was used to develop a model for the prediction of 30-day all-cause mortality and to assess the influence of VA-ECMO on outcomes. Results Overall, 209 patients were randomized to the VA-ECMO and 208 to control. Baseline characteristics between groups were well balanced (median age 63 years, 81% male, 67% presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). At 30-days 100 patients in the VA-ECMO and 102 in the control group were dead. The final XGBoost model contained 27 variables and the 10 most influential variables are shown in Fig. 1. On derivation the model predicted mortality with an AUC of 1.00 and on validation with an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.89), with a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 88% to 100%) and a specificity of 55% (40% to 69%), resulting in a positive predictive value of 65% and a negative predictive value of 92% at a Youden-derived cut-off. Importantly, neither the VA-ECMO therapy nor its complications were among the most influential factors of the model with a relative importance of 1.1% for VA-ECMO therapy and 0.25% for peripheral vascular complications and bleeding complications even being discarded by the model. Conclusion In patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the influence of VA-ECMO therapy on 30-day mortality, even when investigated with complex machine learning models, is negligibly low.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center (US), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Leipzig Heart Institute (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Asklepios Klinik Langen (DE), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE), Franklin University (US), University of Göttingen (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.