Assessment of coronary microvascular function with absolute coronary fl ow measurements

Abstract Background Reliable assessment of microvascular function is essential, both in research setting and clinical practice. New techniques, such as continuous coronary thermodilution, are very promising and could revolutionize the field. However, there is a need for proper validation before widespread use is possible. Purpose The goals of this study were: 1. to validate the potential of saline infusion to generate maximum hyperemia in vivo. 2. to validate absolute blood flow (ABF) measured with continuous coronary thermodilution at higher (40-50 ml/min) infusion speeds 3. To assess the safety of higher infusion speeds. Methods Fourteen closed-chest sheep underwent ABF measurements with increasing saline infusion speeds with and without adenosine. Another seven open-chest sheep underwent these measurements with epicardial doppler flow probes on both the left anterior descending artery and left circumflex coronary artery. Maximal hyperemia was defined as maximal flow after 45 seconds of proximal occlusion. The principles of laboratory animal care and all national regulations were followed. Results 20 ml/min of saline infusion induced lower hyperemic coronary flow (140 vs 191 ml/min, p=0.0165) and lower coronary flow reserve (CFR) (1.82 vs 3.21, p= <0.0001) than coronary occlusion. In contrast, 30 ml/min resulted in flow (196 vs 192 ml/min, p=0.8292) and CFR (2.77 vs 3.21, p=0.1107) that were not different from post-occlusion. There was a significant flow overestimation bias (Bland-Altman: Bias ± SD: -73.09 ± 30.52, 95% Limits of agreement: -132.9 to -13.27) with 40-50ml/min of saline. Occasionally, higher saline infusion rates resulted in ischemic ECG-changes and ventricular fibrillation (9.5% at 50 ml/min). Conclusions Continuous saline infusion of 30ml/min, but not 20 ml/min, induced maximal hyperemia. ABF measured with saline infusion speeds of 40-50 ml/min was not accurate nor safe, and should therefore be avoided.