Impact of Lp(a) on lipid control in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background The lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a genetically determined low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle. Lp(a) levels above 50mg/dl have been correlated to an increased risk of atherosclerosis and major adverse cardiovascular events. Thus, treatments designed to reduce Lp(a) levels are currently under investigation. However, it is unknown how high Lp(a) concentrations affect the control of lipid profile. Purpose The purpose of this project is to investigate how Lp(a) impacts lipid profile control in individuals with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods We designed a single-center prospective registry including consecutive patients admitted for ACS. Lp(a) levels were obtained from all enrolled patients during hospitalization; lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides) was obtained at admission and at the 6-month follow-up (6MFU). Patients were stratified according Lp(a) concentration (low-Lp(a): Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL; high-Lp(a): Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL). LDL-cholesterol (LDLcorr) levels corrected for concentration of Lp(a) were calculated as LDLcorr= LDLmeasured – 30%Lp(a). At discharge cholesterol lowering drugs were introduced or titrated as standard of care. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients reaching target LDL and LDLcorr (<55 mg/dL) at 6MFU. The secondary endpoints were the correlations between Lp(a) levels and lipid profile, both at baseline and at 6MFU, as well as the correlation between Lp(a) levels and the total number of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in the study population. Results From February 2020 through September 2023, a total of 409 patients were included: 305 (74.6%) with Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL; 104 (25.4%) with Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL (Table 1). High-Lp(a) patients showed a lower prevalence of diabetes (14.2% vs 27.87%, P = 0.0055), an overall lower number of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (>2 in 25.9% vs 38.1%, P=0.0244). High-Lp(a) patients showed higher level of LDL-cholesterol compared to the low-Lp(a) population both at baseline (124±52 mg/dL vs 110.4±44 mg/dL, P= 0.0263) and at 6MFU (70.5±21 vs 63.8±29, P= 0.0208) with fewer patients achieving the target LDL cholesterol levels (21.57% vs 40.13%, P=0.0184). Estimating the true LDL concentration (LDLcorr) the percentage of patients reaching target LDL cholesterol levels at FU significantly increased in the high-Lp(a) group (from 21.57% to 76.5%), with a minimal increase noticeable in the low-Lp(a) population (from 40.13% to 48.41%, p 0,1870). Conclusions In ACS population, patients with high Lp(a) concentrations have fewer traditional CV risk factors and a lower prevalence of diabetes. High-Lp(a) patients, furthermore, seem more challenging to meet LDL target at 6 month follow up, but not when the LDL values are adjusted for Lp(a).