Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with myocarditis - still justified in the CMR era? A single-centre experience

Abstract Background Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is still considered the diagnostic gold standard for myocarditis. However, in the past decades, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was established as a non-invasive tool supporting the diagnosis of myocarditis. Furthermore, there is often reluctance in performing EMB due to rare but potentially severe complications. We therefore sought to identify patient subgroups that could potentially derive benefits from EMB. This involved a comprehensive analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes resulting from the procedure at our centre. Methods In this retrospective single-centre study, data of all patients presenting with (peri-) myocarditis between 01/2016 and 06/2023 at our tertiary care centre were included. Frequency of histological confirmation of acute myocarditis and histology leading to immunosuppressive therapy were analysed according to patient risks. Prespecified risk factors were (i) LV-EF ≤30%, (ii) presence of severe arrhythmias (VF, VT, high grade AV-block) or (iii) pre-existing autoimmune disease. Furthermore, the subgroup of recurrent myocarditis cases was analysed separately. Results A total of 150 consecutive patients (36.7 ± 15.5 years, 77.3% male) were included in this study. 26/150 patients had a documented EF ≤30%, 13/150 an EF >30% with another risk factor and 111/150 an EF>30% without another risk factor. EMB was performed in 21/26 patients with EF ≤30% (80.7%), in 7/13 patients with EF >30% and another risk factors (53.8%) and in 16/111 (14%) patients without risk factors. EMB led to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy in 11/28 patients with risk factors (39.3%) and in none of the patients without risk factors (0/16, 0%, p=0.003)(figure 1). With respect to the subgroup of patients presenting with recurrent myocarditis (n=10), no specific therapy was performed. Conclusion Due to a high therapeutic yield for initiation of immunosuppressive therapy in non-infectious myocarditis, performing EMB should be considered in all high-risk patients. In patients without clinical risk factors including cases of recurrent or relapsing myocarditis no specific therapy was initiated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1238
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with myocarditis - still justified in the CMR era? A single-centre experience

Ute Mons, Lenhard Pennig, Roman Pfister, K Klingel et al.
European Heart Journal
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
article

Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with myocarditis - still justified in the CMR era? A single-centre experience

Ute Mons, Lenhard Pennig, Roman Pfister, K Klingel, Henrik ten Freyhaus, Katharina Seuthe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is still considered the diagnostic gold standard for myocarditis. However, in the past decades, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was established as a non-invasive tool supporting the diagnosis of myocarditis. Furthermore, there is often reluctance in performing EMB due to rare but potentially severe complications. We therefore sought to identify patient subgroups that could potentially derive benefits from EMB. This involved a comprehensive analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes resulting from the procedure at our centre. Methods In this retrospective single-centre study, data of all patients presenting with (peri-) myocarditis between 01/2016 and 06/2023 at our tertiary care centre were included. Frequency of histological confirmation of acute myocarditis and histology leading to immunosuppressive therapy were analysed according to patient risks. Prespecified risk factors were (i) LV-EF ≤30%, (ii) presence of severe arrhythmias (VF, VT, high grade AV-block) or (iii) pre-existing autoimmune disease. Furthermore, the subgroup of recurrent myocarditis cases was analysed separately. Results A total of 150 consecutive patients (36.7 ± 15.5 years, 77.3% male) were included in this study. 26/150 patients had a documented EF ≤30%, 13/150 an EF >30% with another risk factor and 111/150 an EF>30% without another risk factor. EMB was performed in 21/26 patients with EF ≤30% (80.7%), in 7/13 patients with EF >30% and another risk factors (53.8%) and in 16/111 (14%) patients without risk factors. EMB led to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy in 11/28 patients with risk factors (39.3%) and in none of the patients without risk factors (0/16, 0%, p=0.003)(figure 1). With respect to the subgroup of patients presenting with recurrent myocarditis (n=10), no specific therapy was performed. Conclusion Due to a high therapeutic yield for initiation of immunosuppressive therapy in non-infectious myocarditis, performing EMB should be considered in all high-risk patients. In patients without clinical risk factors including cases of recurrent or relapsing myocarditis no specific therapy was initiated.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.