Relationship between lipoprotein(a) and endogenous fibrinolytic status in patients with STEMI

Abstract Background The risk of myocardial infarction is at least doubled in individuals with lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels >90th percentile.[1] Lp(a) may exert pro-thrombotic effects by impairing fibrinolysis. Lp(a) has a high degree of homology to plasminogen and can competitively inhibit tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-mediated plasminogen activation and tPA-mediated clot lysis.[2] Furthermore, Lp(a) stimulates the activity of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, the major inhibitor of the fibrinolytic system. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), impaired endogenous fibrinolysis is a strong, independent risk factor for recurrent cardiovascular events,[3] but the drivers of this are not fully understood. Whether impaired endogenous fibrinolysis is related to increased Lp(a) levels in patients with STEMI, is not known. Purpose We aimed to assess the relationship between Lp(a) and endogenous fibrinolysis in patients with STEMI. Methods In a prospective, observational study, venous blood samples were drawn from patients presenting with STEMI immediately before revascularisation, after dual antiplatelet therapy but before heparin administration. Endogenous fibrinolysis was measured immediately in non-anticoagulated whole blood using the point-of-care Global Thrombosis Test, which measures the time for occlusive thrombus formation under high shear (occlusion time) and the time for spontaneous lysis of the thrombus (lysis time).[3] Assessment of Lp(a) levels, measured by particle enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay, was performed with paired plasma samples, standardized against the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference material SRM2B for nmol/L. Lp(a) >32 nmol/L is associated with increased risk of ischaemic heart disease. Results A total of 80 patients were included (age 64±14y, 25% females and 86% Caucasian). There was a positive correlation between Lp(a) level and lysis time (r = 0.330, P = 0.003) (Figure 1). Lysis time was significantly longer in patients with Lp(a) >32 nmol/L (2782 [1626-3683] vs. 1725 [1259-2955] s, P = 0.044). Using a cut-point of lysis time ≥2500 s previously associated with a significantly increased cardiovascular risk in patients with STEMI, we showed that Lp(a) was significantly higher in patients with lysis time ≥2500 s (40 (22-111) vs. 18 (7-73) nmol/L, P = 0.045). Table 1 shows the relationship between clinical characteristics and Lp(a) and lysis time. Lp(a) level was higher in non-Caucasian patients. There was no correlation between Lp(a) and occlusion time (r = 0.156, P = 0.168). Conclusion In patients with STEMI, longer endogenous fibrinolysis time is related to higher Lp(a) level. Raised Lp(a) levels may, in part, contribute to impaired endogenous fibrinolysis. Future studies are required to assess whether reduction in Lp(a) with novel therapies currently in phase 3 trials can favourably modulate fibrinolysis and improve clinical outcomes.Figure 1