Prognostic impact of the extent of coronary artery disease in patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction undergoing complete percutaneous revascularization
Abstract Background The management of acute myocardial infarction has been revolutionised by the introduction of early coronary angiography and the reperfusion strategies. Recent studies support the standard of care of complete myocardial revascularization in all patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without assessing the prognostic role of the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose To evaluate whether the extent of CAD in patients with STEMI has a prognostic impact independent of complete myocardial revascularization. Methods Observational cohort study of 365 patients with STEMI who underwent complete revascularization. For each patient the extent of CAD has been quantified using Gensini Score (GS), which takes into account both the severity and location of the lesions. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality, while cardiovascular mortality and a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular mortality, recurrent acute myocardial infarction or myocardial revascularization and stroke) were defined as secondary endpoints. To assess the prognostic role of GS in predicting all-cause mortality, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The best cut-off was determined as the one that maximized Youden's index (sensitivity + specificity - 1). Results Patients with a GS >80, indicating extensive coronary disease, had significantly higher rates of both cardiovascular [4 (16.7%) vs. 12 (3.5%); p = 0.002] and all-cause mortality [5 (20.8%) vs. 24 (7%); p = 0.016], than those with a GS ≤80. A GS >80 was demonstrated to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio = 5; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-16.8; p = 0.01] Conclusions The Gensini Score can identify high-risk patients with STEMI who may benefit from more intensive therapies to improve prognosis, although current guidelines do not specify treatment based on the extent of coronary disease.Long-term outcomes according to GSPrognostic value of GS
Authors
- Lisa Canton
- Carmine Pizzi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4048-675X)
- Alberto Foà (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1216-4478)
- Davide Bertolini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2554-2512)
- Chiara Valeria Marinelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8806-5655)
- Sara Amicone
- Angelo Sansonetti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4565-4310)
- Francesco Pio Tattilo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3709-5791)
- Khrystyna Ryabenko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-1502)
- Andrea Impellizzeri
- Marcello Casuso Alvarez
- Matteo Armillotta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7971-8052)
- Ornella Di Iuorio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6352-0490)
- Rebecca Belà
- Claudio Asta
Institutions
- University of Bologna (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Heart Journal
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1531
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00