Left ventricular end-systolic and diastolic elastance as predictors of cardiac events in patients who underwent mitral valve surgery for severe mitral regurgitation

Abstract Background/Introduction In severe mitral regurgitation (MR), the prognostic significance of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV dimensions is well-established. However, the assessment of diastolic function in this patient presents a notable challenge, and its impact on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. Purpose This study was designed to explore the potential of LV end-systolic (Ees) and diastolic elastance (Eed) as novel predictors for cardiac events following surgery. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed on 199 patients (53% male, average age 60 years, mean LVEF 60.0%) with severe MR and undergoing surgery. Preoperative Ees and Eed were calculated using established formulas: Ees = (systolic blood pressure x 0.9) / LV end-systolic volume, and Eed = left atrial pressure / stroke volume, with left atrial pressure estimated from mitral Doppler flow parameters as SBP – (4 x peak MR velocity²). The primary outcome was defined as either cardiac death or hospitalization due to heart failure. Results Average values for Ees and Eed were 2.61 (IQR: 1.67-3.20) and 0.32 (IQR: 0.05-0.57), respectively. Univariate analysis indicated Ees (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.99-1.57, p = 0.066) and Eed (HR: 5.93, 95% CI: 2.87-12.26) as potential predictors. Adjusting for age, LVEF, and LV dimensions, Eed remained an independent predictor of cardiac events (HR: 5.89, 95% CI: 2.81-12.28). Stratifying Eed at a threshold of 0.31—identified as best sum of sensitivity and specificity—revealed that Eed > 0.31 were associated with a 3.9-fold increase in cardiac events compared to those with Eed ≤ 0.31 (p = 0.008). (Fig.) Conclusions The assessment of Eed is a straightforward and readily available parameter in routine clinical practice. Our findings advocate for the inclusion of preoperative Eed evaluation as an independent prognostic indicator for patients undergoing surgery for severe MR.Event free survival by Eed

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.126
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Left ventricular end-systolic and diastolic elastance as predictors of cardiac events in patients who underwent mitral valve surgery for severe mitral regurgitation

G Y Cho, In‐Chang Hwang, Yeonyee Elizabeth Yoon, J S Park et al.
1 links
European Heart Journal
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Left ventricular end-systolic and diastolic elastance as predictors of cardiac events in patients who underwent mitral valve surgery for severe mitral regurgitation

G Y Cho, In‐Chang Hwang, Yeonyee Elizabeth Yoon, J S Park, H M Choi, S A Noh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction In severe mitral regurgitation (MR), the prognostic significance of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV dimensions is well-established. However, the assessment of diastolic function in this patient presents a notable challenge, and its impact on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. Purpose This study was designed to explore the potential of LV end-systolic (Ees) and diastolic elastance (Eed) as novel predictors for cardiac events following surgery. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed on 199 patients (53% male, average age 60 years, mean LVEF 60.0%) with severe MR and undergoing surgery. Preoperative Ees and Eed were calculated using established formulas: Ees = (systolic blood pressure x 0.9) / LV end-systolic volume, and Eed = left atrial pressure / stroke volume, with left atrial pressure estimated from mitral Doppler flow parameters as SBP – (4 x peak MR velocity²). The primary outcome was defined as either cardiac death or hospitalization due to heart failure. Results Average values for Ees and Eed were 2.61 (IQR: 1.67-3.20) and 0.32 (IQR: 0.05-0.57), respectively. Univariate analysis indicated Ees (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.99-1.57, p = 0.066) and Eed (HR: 5.93, 95% CI: 2.87-12.26) as potential predictors. Adjusting for age, LVEF, and LV dimensions, Eed remained an independent predictor of cardiac events (HR: 5.89, 95% CI: 2.81-12.28). Stratifying Eed at a threshold of 0.31—identified as best sum of sensitivity and specificity—revealed that Eed > 0.31 were associated with a 3.9-fold increase in cardiac events compared to those with Eed ≤ 0.31 (p = 0.008). (Fig.) Conclusions The assessment of Eed is a straightforward and readily available parameter in routine clinical practice. Our findings advocate for the inclusion of preoperative Eed evaluation as an independent prognostic indicator for patients undergoing surgery for severe MR.Event free survival by Eed

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.