Percutaneous revascularization in late-presenting STEMI with absence of viability: effects on left ventricular remodeling and scar

Abstract Introduction In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be conducted within 12 hours of symptom onset. The potential benefits attributable to late reperfusion in STEMI fall under the "open artery hypothesis" where the stunned peri-infarction zone after revascularization would restore blood supply and contractility. Purpose To estimate the differences on the LV ejection fraction (LVEF), indexed LV end-systolic volume (iLVESV) and scar in patients with STEMI without viabilitity randomized to optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone or OMT and a late percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed between 24 hours and 30 days after the event. Methods Patients with non-reperfused STEMI were evaluated from September 2021 to June 2022 at a tertiary cardiology hospital. The patients underwent Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) to assess myocardial viability and were classified as non-viable if they had only 1 wall segment with less than fifty percent thickness of the affected wall with late gadolinium enhancement. The patients were randomized to PCI or OMT alone. CMR was repeated at 6 months to evaluate LVEF, iLVESV and fibrosis. This summary presents a planned partial analysis of the 6-month results (N=51). Descriptive statistics analysis included central and dispersion estimators, or absolute and relative frequencies. To explore the differences between groups and time, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were run, and results were given as point-estimates and confidence intervals at 95% (95% CI). A significance level of 5% was adopted for inferential analysis. Results 51 patients (60±11 years, 71% male) were included in the analysis. Of this total, 24 were randomized to PCI + OMT, and 27 to isolated OMT. The groups showed balanced distribution regarding clinical characteristics and initial CMR parameters (LVEF, iLVESV, and fibrosis). The difference in LVEF at the end of 6 months between the OMT and PCI groups was 2.07%, favoring the OMT group; however, this difference was not significant (p= 0.677, 95% CI: -5 to 10). Between the groups, the difference at the end of 6 months in iLVESV was -6.82 ml/m², also without statistical significance (p= 0.858, 95% CI: -19 to 11). There was a significant reduction in the amount of fibrosis in both PCI group with -14.68g (p= 0.011) and in the OMT group with -12.57g (p= 0.009). Detailed results are presented in Table 1. Conclusion Despite a significant reduction in fibrosis in both groups, there was no superiority observed in late PCI compared to isolated OMT in reducing reverse remodeling and fibrosis in patients with non-viable STEMI when compared to isolated OMT.Remodeling changes.