Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in women with severe coronary artery disease

Abstract Background The optimal revascularization strategy for severe coronary artery disease (CAD) in women remains controversial. Despite differences between women and men in the development of CAD, there remains a paucity of comparative real-world observational evidence comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in women. Purpose We evaluated short and long-term outcomes of PCI and CABG in women with severe CAD. Methods We conducted a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using linked clinical and administrative databases in Ontario, Canada to obtain records of women with left main, 3-vessel disease, or 2-vessel disease with proximal left anterior descending artery involvement undergoing PCI or CABG from April 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2021. Patients who were >80 years of age and patients who underwent urgent or emergent procedures were excluded for the primary analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, and death (MACCE). Secondary outcomes included the individual components of MACCE and a composite of readmission for MI, heart failure, and stroke. Following multiple imputation and propensity score-matching, the Cox proportional hazards model and Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model with robust variance estimators accounting for death as a competing risk were used to evaluate long-term outcomes. Results In the primary cohort, 2469 patients underwent PCI and 3,721 patients underwent CABG. After propensity score matching, including by coronary disease territory, 2,033 well-balanced pairs were identified, with standardized mean differences <0.10 for all covariates. In-hospital death and stroke were significantly lower with PCI than with CABG (0.7% vs 1.5%, p=0.036) and (<0.2% vs 1.4%, p<0.001), respectively, and there was no difference in perioperative MI between PCI and CABG (1.1% vs 0.6%, p=0.121). At a median (IQR) of 5.1 (2.9-7.5) years, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was higher with PCI compared with CABG (37.7% vs 23.3%, HR 1.79, [95% CI: 1.66-1.91], p<0.001) (Figure 1). All-cause mortality was higher with PCI compared with CABG (17.8% vs 13.4%, HR 1.33, [95% CI: 1.21-1.45], p<0.001) (Figure 2). The composite readmission outcome (MI, heart failure, stroke) was higher with PCI compared with CABG (16.2% vs 11.2%, HR 1.42, [95% CI: 1.37-1.48], p<0.001). Conclusion In women with severe CAD, CABG appears to be associated with a long-term reduction in MACCE and mortality compared with PCI. Our findings provide evidence to suggest women with severe CAD may derive greater long-term benefit from CABG compared to PCI and suggest that the treatment recommendation should shift towards CABG in appropriately selected women.Figure 1.MACCE free survivalFigure 2.Overall survival