Hold Music

The notion of sonic intimacy has received increasing scholarly attention in recent years, but less well-established has been what it means for a sonic encounter to be non-intimate. This essay proposes an opposite to sonic intimacy, namely sonic estrangement, and argues that hold music—music played to callers when they have been placed ‘on hold’—effects sonic estrangement in three ways. First, through its timbral quality, which in its lack of fullness and the fragility of signal creates a sense of distance and disjuncture. Second, through its function, which is to address the caller as an anonymous consumer, thus setting up a depersonalised relationship between caller and receiver. Third, in the way it shuts out the caller from their desired point of contact, thus symbolising an excess of demand, exclusion, and a lack of care. These three forms of estrangement counteract sonic intimacy—and can therefore be considered oppositional to it—in that they undermine three components of intimate sonic encounters: the proximate, the personal, and the attentive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Extreme Anthropology
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/jea.11783
Primary Topic
Diverse Music Education Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hold Music

Max Blansjaar
Journal of Extreme Anthropology
Diverse Music Education Insights
article

Hold Music

Max Blansjaar
article en

Abstract

The notion of sonic intimacy has received increasing scholarly attention in recent years, but less well-established has been what it means for a sonic encounter to be non-intimate. This essay proposes an opposite to sonic intimacy, namely sonic estrangement, and argues that hold music—music played to callers when they have been placed ‘on hold’—effects sonic estrangement in three ways. First, through its timbral quality, which in its lack of fullness and the fragility of signal creates a sense of distance and disjuncture. Second, through its function, which is to address the caller as an anonymous consumer, thus setting up a depersonalised relationship between caller and receiver. Third, in the way it shuts out the caller from their desired point of contact, thus symbolising an excess of demand, exclusion, and a lack of care. These three forms of estrangement counteract sonic intimacy—and can therefore be considered oppositional to it—in that they undermine three components of intimate sonic encounters: the proximate, the personal, and the attentive.

Journal of Extreme AnthropologyVol. 7(2)
St. Catherine University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Diverse Music Education Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.