Application of Asaoka’s Method in Multistage Triaxial Compression Testing of Normally Consolidated Soils

ABSTRACT Determination of shear strength parameters becomes a challenge when it is difficult to retrieve a minimum of three identical undisturbed soil specimens. In such a situation, multistage triaxial compression testing can be adopted using a single specimen. Multistage triaxial testing involves stage-wise consolidation and shearing at three confining pressures without the failure of the specimen until the last stage. A critical issue associated with multistage triaxial testing is the estimation of ultimate deviator stress and the corresponding pore pressure as the specimen was not allowed to reach failure in each stage. Conventionally, the failure stress state in each stage is computed by extrapolating the stress–strain and pore pressure–strain data to a finite strain by employing Kondner’s rectangular hyperbola model. However, it is reported in the literature that the aforementioned method often overestimates the deviator stress and pore pressure values. In this context, the present study investigates the suitability of Asaoka’s observational procedure for predicting these values at failure state. The validity of the proposed procedure is verified by comparing the ultimate deviator stress and pore pressure values obtained by analyzing the stress–strain data collected from the literature and by performing multistage triaxial testing on three reconstituted soil samples with that of the rectangular hyperbola method. From the results, it was observed that Asaoka’s method is more suited for predicting the shear strength parameters. It is believed that the proposed methodology would aid in obtaining the shear strength parameters of a soil from a single specimen by conducting multistage triaxial testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geotechnical Testing Journal
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj20230555
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Asaoka’s Method in Multistage Triaxial Compression Testing of Normally Consolidated Soils

K. P. Lijith, R. G. Robinson
Geotechnical Testing Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Application of Asaoka’s Method in Multistage Triaxial Compression Testing of Normally Consolidated Soils

K. P. Lijith, R. G. Robinson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Determination of shear strength parameters becomes a challenge when it is difficult to retrieve a minimum of three identical undisturbed soil specimens. In such a situation, multistage triaxial compression testing can be adopted using a single specimen. Multistage triaxial testing involves stage-wise consolidation and shearing at three confining pressures without the failure of the specimen until the last stage. A critical issue associated with multistage triaxial testing is the estimation of ultimate deviator stress and the corresponding pore pressure as the specimen was not allowed to reach failure in each stage. Conventionally, the failure stress state in each stage is computed by extrapolating the stress–strain and pore pressure–strain data to a finite strain by employing Kondner’s rectangular hyperbola model. However, it is reported in the literature that the aforementioned method often overestimates the deviator stress and pore pressure values. In this context, the present study investigates the suitability of Asaoka’s observational procedure for predicting these values at failure state. The validity of the proposed procedure is verified by comparing the ultimate deviator stress and pore pressure values obtained by analyzing the stress–strain data collected from the literature and by performing multistage triaxial testing on three reconstituted soil samples with that of the rectangular hyperbola method. From the results, it was observed that Asaoka’s method is more suited for predicting the shear strength parameters. It is believed that the proposed methodology would aid in obtaining the shear strength parameters of a soil from a single specimen by conducting multistage triaxial testing.

Geotechnical Testing JournalVol. 47(6)
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.